Dan Martin and Connor Farren will square off in the qualifications of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 5:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Connor Farren who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Connor Farren is the pick to win this match.
Connor Farren -> 1.86
Dan Martin -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dan Martin vs. Connor Farren
There is no head to head record between Dan Martin and Connor Farren since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Dan Martin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-25 | 13-14 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-13 | 0-7 | 5-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 14-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Dan got to the qualifications after beating Roy Smith 7-66 6-3.
In the qualifications, Dan had a good straight sets win against Smith (7-66 6-3). During the match, Martin scored 68 points vs Smith’s 58. The Canadian was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Martin bagged 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Dan Martin was extremely efficient on serve to win 76% (31/41) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Dan broke Smith twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Martin has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 67% of his matches (18-9). 13-3 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Martin has a compiled13-4 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Martin has a composed 13-4 win-loss record in 2022, 13-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Connor Farren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10-10 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-22 | 17-19 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-11 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-7 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-27 | 25-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 880, Farren reached the qualifications after beating Sid Donarski 3-6 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications against Donarski, Farren recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-0 6-1). During the match Farren scored 92 points vs Donarski’s 60. Connor was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Farren made 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Connor Farren was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 84% (32/38) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Donarski 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Connor has an overall 12-14 win-loss record in 2022, 12-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin | Farren |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 |
| Pts | 68-58 | 92-60 |
| Total Points | 126 | 152 |
| Winners | 31 | 32 |
| %Winners | 46% | 35% |
Both Martin and Farren played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Connor Farren lost 1 set while Dan Martin hasn’t dropped a set so far. Martin has played 1 set(s) less than Farren (2 vs 3). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (22). Dan scored 31 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 32 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin | Farren |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 41/64 | 38/61 |
| %1st in | 64% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 32/38 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 52% |
Martin scored 8 aces . Farren blasted 4 aces . Martin won 76% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Farren won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin | Farren |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 6/14 |
| % Converted | 50% | 43% |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Canadian broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Dan dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Connor broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Martin | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 68-58 | 68-58 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/64 | 41/64 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 31/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Farren | |||
| Q1 Donarski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 92-60 | 92-60 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 38/61 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 32/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kelsey StevensonStevenson – Luke SavilleSaville (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Hady HabibHabib (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Omni KumarKumar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Sekou BangouraBangoura (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Julian CashCash (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Osgar O’HoisinO’Hoisin – Justin BoulaisBoulais (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Jonathan EyssericEysseric (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – Connor FarrenFarren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taha BaadiBaadi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
