Taro Daniel and Emilio Nava will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Taro Daniel who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Taro Daniel is the pick to win this match.
Taro Daniel -> 1.32
Emilio Nava -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Taro Daniel vs. Emilio Nava
This will be the 2nd time that Taro Daniel and Emilio Nava fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Daniel (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Daniel won 7-5 7-5 in the qualifications in Indian wells back in March 2022.
Taro Daniel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-15 | 7-8 | 4-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-30 | 34-16 | 7-10 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 27-17 | 12-7 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-25 | 5-7 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-15 | 9-9 | 3-5 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 93, Daniel reached the qualifications after defeating Matija Pecotic 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Pecotic (6-1 6-1). During the match, Daniel scored 63 points vs Pecotic’s 36. The Japanese was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Daniel recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Taro Daniel lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Daniel put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (7/15) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Pecotic 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Daniel has a good record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (379-274). 23-10 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Daniel has an aggregate 122-94 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Japanese has a compiled 38-21 win-loss record in 2022, 23-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-14 | 11-7 | 4-5 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 200 (career-high), the American got to the qualifications after defeating Donald Young 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Nava had a good straight sets win against Young (6-2 6-2). During the match Nava scored 63 points vs Young’s 42. Emilio was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Nava recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Nava was pretty effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nava broke Young 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Nava’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Shymkent 1 Challenger.
Nava has an overall 31-18 win-loss record in 2022, 8-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Daniel | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 16 |
| Pts | 63-36 | 63-42 |
| Total Points | 99 | 105 |
| Winners | 23 | 22 |
| %Winners | 37% | 35% |
Both Daniel and Nava played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Daniel and Nava have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Daniel played 2 games less than Nava. The Japanese scored 23 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio scored 22 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Daniel | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 29/54 |
| %1st in | 69% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 22/29 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 16/25 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 64% |
Daniel blasted 8 aces . Nava struck 4 aces . Daniel won 70% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Daniel | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 46% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Daniel lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Emilio broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Emilio was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Daniel | |||
| Q1 Pecotic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 63-36 | 63-36 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Young |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-42 | 63-42 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/54 | 29/54 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLLLL
LWLLWWLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Dusan LajovicLajovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – David GoffinGoffin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael YmerYmer – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
