Marton Fucsovics and Jason Murray Kubler will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Murray Kubler who should win in 3 sets.
Jason Murray Kubler -> 1.61
Marton Fucsovics -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Marton Fucsovics vs. Jason Murray Kubler
This will be the 3rd time that Marton Fucsovics and Jason Murray Kubler clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Fucsovics (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Fucsovics won 6-4 3-6 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Trnava Challenger back in 2014.
Marton Fucsovics
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-22 | 18-6 | 11-9 | 4-4 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 22-19 | 6-8 | 9-5 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-25 | 17-11 | 6-6 | 5-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-26 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 15-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-24 | 10-9 | 3-5 | 10-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91, Marton reached the qualifications after defeating Andres Martin 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Hungarian had a good straight sets win against Martin (6-3 6-3). During the match, Fucsovics scored 69 points vs Martin’s 55. The Hungarian was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fucsovics fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Marton Fucsovics lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Fucsovics put 48% of his first serves in, winning 66% (19/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. Fucsovics broke Martin 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Fucsovics has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (325-237). 6-8 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fucsovics has an aggregate 103-79 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Hungarian has an overall 16-17 win-loss record in 2022, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Jason Murray Kubler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-14 | 28-11 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-19 | 10-9 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-22 | 17-10 | 20-5 | 4-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-15 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118, Murray Kubler got to the qualifications after defeating Inaki Montes-De La Torre 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Jason had a good straight sets win against Montes-De La Torre (7-5 6-3). During the match Murray Kubler scored 68 points vs Montes-De La Torre’s 52. Jason was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Murray Kubler blasted 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jason Murray Kubler lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Murray Kubler put 63% of his first serves in, winning 82% (28/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (7/20) on the 2nd serve. Jason broke Montes-De La Torre 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Murray Kubler’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Canberra,the Little Rock Challenger and the Orlando Challenger.
Jason has an aggregate 43-14 win-loss record in 2022, 14-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Murray Kubler has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fucsovics | Murray Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 |
| Pts | 69-55 | 68-52 |
| Total Points | 124 | 120 |
| Winners | 19 | 28 |
| %Winners | 28% | 41% |
Both Fucsovics and Murray Kubler played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fucsovics and Murray Kubler have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fucsovics played 3 games less than Murray Kubler. Fucsovics scored 19 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Jason struck 28 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fucsovics | Murray Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 8 |
| 1st in | 29/60 | 34/54 |
| %1st in | 48% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 28/34 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 7/20 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 35% |
Fucsovics recorded 2 aces . Murray Kubler made 8 aces . Fucsovics won 66% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Murray Kubler won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 35% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fucsovics | Murray Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 45% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 71% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Fucsovics broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Hungarian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Jason broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jason conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fucsovics | |||
| Q1 Martin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 69-55 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/60 | 29/60 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Murray Kubler | |||
| Q1 Montes-De La Torre | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 68-52 | 68-52 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/54 | 34/54 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/20 | 7/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Dusan LajovicLajovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – David GoffinGoffin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael YmerYmer – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction