Tallon Griekspoor and Christopher O Connell will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 3 sets.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.58
Christopher O Connell -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Christopher O Connell
There is no head to head record between Tallon Griekspoor and Christopher O Connell since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tallon Griekspoor
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-24 | 10-11 | 13-8 | 5-4 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-30 | 10-11 | 8-8 | 11-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 14-10 | 3-5 | 12-7 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-6 | 12-6 | 4-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 59-17 | 11-3 | 36-10 | 9-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 45, the Dutch got to the qualifications after defeating Michail Pervolarakis 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Pervolarakis, The Dutch recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Griekspoor scored 93 points vs Pervolarakis’s 90. Griekspoor was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Griekspoor struck 5 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Griekspoor put 54% of his first serves in, winning 74% (34/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (15/39) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Pervolarakis 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Griekspoor has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 65% of his matches (299-158). 4-3 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Griekspoor has a composed102-44 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Dutch’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Amersfoort Challenger.
Tallon has a composed 24-16 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Tallon has never competed in this tournament before.
Christopher O Connell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-28 | 19-15 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-26 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 122, will start his run in Winston-Salem after he played his last match in Winston Salem where he defeated 6-2 6-4 to Nava in the qualifications on the 20th of August.
Christopher has a compiled 32-17 win-loss record in 2022, 15-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
O’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Split Challenger and the Porto Challenger.
In terms of his career, O has an overall 303-173 record. He has a positive 122-80 record on hard.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | O |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 18 |
| Pts | 93-90 | 66-48 |
| Total Points | 183 | 114 |
| Winners | 34 | 25 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Griekspoor and O played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tallon Griekspoor surrendered 1 set while Christopher O Connell hasn’t dropped a set so far. Griekspoor has played 1 set more than O (3 vs 2). Therefore, Griekspoor played 10 games more than O. The Dutch scored 34 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Christopher scored 25 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | O |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 10 |
| 1st in | 46/85 | 26/49 |
| %1st in | 54% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 25/26 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 96% |
| 2nd pts | 15/39 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 43% |
Griekspoor made 5 aces . O recorded 10 aces . Griekspoor won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, O won 96% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | O |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 63% | 36% |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 56% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Tallon dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Christopher broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. O conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Griekspoor | |||
| Q1 Pervolarakis | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 93-90 | 93-90 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 46/85 | 46/85 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/39 | 15/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| O | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Dusan LajovicLajovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – David GoffinGoffin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael YmerYmer – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction