Xinyu Wang and Maddison Inglis will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Odlum Brown VanOpen for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xinyu Wang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Xinyu Wang is the pick to win this match.
Xinyu Wang -> 1.51
Maddison Inglis -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Xinyu Wang vs. Maddison Inglis
There is no head to head record between Xinyu Wang and Maddison Inglis since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Xinyu Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-14 | 12-10 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 32-17 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-27 | 8-14 | 5-5 | 15-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-26 | 10-9 | 6-8 | 14-6 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 6-6 | 2-1 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 82, the Chinese got to the 2nd round after beating Kristina Mladenovic 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Mladenovic (6-4 6-2). During the match, Wang scored 64 points vs Mladenovic’s 51. Xinyu was pretty aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wang struck 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Xinyu Wang lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 48% of her first serves in, winning 58% (15/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Wang broke Mladenovic 7 times after converting 54% of her break points (7/13).
Wang has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 60% of her matches (147-97). 7-10 on hard in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Wang has an overall89-61 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Xinyu has a composed 15-17 win-loss record in 2022, 7-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vancouver
Xinyu has never competed in this tournament before.
Maddison Inglis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 140, Inglis reached the 2nd round after beating Harmony Tan 7-63 1-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Australian defeated Tan (7-63 1-6 6-1). During the match Inglis scored 97 points vs Tan’s 91. Maddison was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Inglis fired 2 aces and she was not very solid on her 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Maddison Inglis lost the serve 5 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Inglis put 60% of her first serves in, winning 68% (38/56) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (14/38) on the 2nd serve. Maddison broke Tan 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Maddison has an aggregate 13-16 win-loss record in 2022, 8-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 |
| Pts | 64-51 | 97-91 |
| Total Points | 115 | 188 |
| Winners | 15 | 38 |
| %Winners | 23% | 39% |
Both Wang and Inglis played 1 match. At the moment, Maddison Inglis dropped 1 set while Xinyu Wang hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Wang has played 1 set(s) less than Inglis (2 vs 3). Therefore, Wang played 9 games less than Inglis. The Chinese scored 15 winners (23% of the total points). On the other side, Inglis blasted 38 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 26/54 | 56/94 |
| %1st in | 48% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 15/26 | 38/56 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 14/38 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 37% |
Wang blasted 2 aces . Inglis bagged 2 aces . Wang won 58% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Inglis won 68% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/13 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 54% | 45% |
| Conceded | 10 | 12 |
| Saved | 6 | 7 |
| % Saved | 60% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 5 |
Xinyu broke her opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Maddison broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Australian conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 58% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| R1 Mladenovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-51 | 64-51 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 23% | 23% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 26/54 | 26/54 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Inglis | |||
| R1 Tan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 1-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 97-91 | 97-91 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 56/94 | 56/94 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 38/56 | 38/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/38 | 14/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLWW
LLWWLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Vancouver
- Chloe PaquetPaquet – Heather WatsonWatson (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Catherine HarrisonHarrison (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (7-5 6-75 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou – Cadence BraceBrace (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Marc SieberSieber (4-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Martin CuevasCuevas – Tomislav BrkicBrkic (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Alexander LazovLazov (7-5 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (2-6 7-67 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Manuel Pena LopezPena Lopez (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marsel IlhanIlhan – Thomas StatzbergerStatzberger (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou – Chloe PaquetPaquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
