Michal Mikula and Skander Mansouri will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on COURT 13. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Skander Mansouri who should win in 3 sets.
Skander Mansouri -> 1.44
Michal Mikula -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Michal Mikula vs. Skander Mansouri
There is no head to head record between Michal Mikula and Skander Mansouri since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Michal Mikula
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 11-7 | 2-8 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-16 | 8-9 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-19 | 11-5 | 11-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Mikula got to the 1st round after beating Bogdan Bobrov 5-7 6-3 6-2 and Aldin Setkic 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, Mikula had a good straight sets win against Setkic (7-5 6-2). During the match, Mikula scored 75 points vs Setkic’s 51. Michal was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mikula blasted 8 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Michal Mikula was pretty effective on serve to win 83% (30/36) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Pole broke Setkic 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Michal started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
Mikula has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (49-34). 5-4 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mikula has a compiled25-14 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Michal has a compiled 10-8 win-loss record in 2022, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Skander Mansouri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-7 | 1-4 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 30-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 73-35 | 71-26 | 0-3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-25 | 41-17 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-15 | 26-13 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 299 (career-high), the Tunisian got to the 1st round after defeating Yann Wojcik 6-2 6-4 and Luke Johnson 6-3 4-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Skander defeated Johnson (6-3 4-6 6-2). During the match Mansouri scored 93 points vs Johnson’s 75. Skander was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Mansouri recorded 14 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Skander Mansouri was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (41/55) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Mansouri broke Johnson 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Tunisian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Skander’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Monastir and M15 Monastir.
Skander has a composed 50-21 win-loss record in 2022, 49-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mikula | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 49 | 45 |
| Pts | 175-133 | 153-121 |
| Total Points | 308 | 274 |
| Winners | 67 | 69 |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% |
Both Mikula and Mansouri played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Michal Mikula surrendered 1 set, while Skander Mansouri dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Mikula and Mansouri have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Mikula played 4 games more than Mansouri. Michal scored 67 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Skander blasted 69 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mikula | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 10 |
| 1st in | 91/142 | 90/133 |
| %1st in | 64% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 67/91 | 69/90 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 32/51 | 21/43 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 49% |
Mikula blasted 13 aces (6.5 per match). Mansouri recorded 20 aces (10 per match). Mikula won 74% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Mansouri won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mikula | Mansouri |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 8 |
| Converted | 9/28 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 32% | 47% |
| Conceded | 10 | 7 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 60% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Mikula broke his opponents 9 times with a 32% conversion rate. The Pole lost his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Mansouri broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Skander conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mikula | ||||
| Q1 Bobrov | Q3 Setkic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 20 | 49 | |
| pts | 100-82 | 75-51 | 175-133 | |
| Total points | 182 | 126 | 308 | |
| Winners | 37 | 30 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 40% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/85 | 36/57 | 91/142 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 37/55 | 30/36 | 67/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 83% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/30 | 11/21 | 32/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 52% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/19 | 4/9 | 9/28 | |
| Converted % | 26% | 44% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 75% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Mansouri | ||||
| Q1 Wojcik | Q3 Johnson | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 45 | |
| pts | 60-46 | 93-75 | 153-121 | |
| Total points | 106 | 168 | 274 | |
| Winners | 28 | 41 | 69 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 44% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 14 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/55 | 55/78 | 90/133 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 41/55 | 69/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 75% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 13/23 | 21/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 57% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/10 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 40% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 1/3 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 33% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Harold MayotMayot – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Maxime JanvierJanvier (4-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dan AddedAdded – Mirza BasicBasic (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Szymon KielanKielan (6-3 1-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Michal MikulaMikula (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Pablo AndujarAndujar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Robin HaaseHaase (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction