Beibit Zhukayev and Marko Topo will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 12. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Beibit Zhukayev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Beibit Zhukayev is the pick to win this match.
Beibit Zhukayev -> 1.63
Marko Topo -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Beibit Zhukayev vs. Marko Topo
There is no head to head record between Beibit Zhukayev and Marko Topo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Beibit Zhukayev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 403, Beibit reached the qualifications after beating Alexander Erler 6-75 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Erler, Zhukayev recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-3 6-3). During the match, Zhukayev scored 100 points vs Erler’s 86. Beibit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zhukayev recorded 14 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Beibit Zhukayev was extremely effective on serve to win 84% (42/50) of his 1st serve and 64% (25/39) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Kazakhstani broke Erler 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Zhukayev has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 52% of his matches (87-81). 22-13 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zhukayev has an aggregate59-40 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
The Kazakhstani’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Sultan.
Beibit has an aggregate 29-18 win-loss record in 2022, 22-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Zhukayev has never competed in this tournament before.
Marko Topo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 9-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 26-28 | 8-6 | 12-13 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 4-5 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 495 (career-high), the Serbian reached the qualifications after defeating Martyn Pawelski 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Marko defeated Pawelski (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match Topo scored 91 points vs Pawelski’s 79. The Serbian was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Topo scored 10 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Marko Topo lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Topo put 52% of his first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 66% (27/41) on the 2nd serve. The Serbian broke Pawelski 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Serbian has an aggregate 17-19 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhukayev | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 28 |
| Pts | 100-86 | 91-79 |
| Total Points | 186 | 170 |
| Winners | 42 | 30 |
| %Winners | 42% | 33% |
Both Zhukayev and Topo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Beibit Zhukayev lost 1 set, while Marko Topo lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Zhukayev and Topo have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Zhukayev played 3 games more than Topo. The Kazakhstani scored 42 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Marko blasted 30 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhukayev | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 10 |
| 1st in | 50/89 | 44/85 |
| %1st in | 56% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 42/50 | 30/44 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 25/39 | 27/41 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 66% |
Zhukayev struck 14 aces . Topo scored 10 aces . Zhukayev won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Topo won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhukayev | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/11 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 27% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Kazakhstani broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Beibit extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Serbian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zhukayev | |||
| Q1 Erler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 100-86 | 100-86 | |
| Total points | 186 | 186 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 50/89 | 50/89 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 42/50 | 42/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/39 | 25/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Topo | |||
| Q1 Pawelski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 91-79 | 91-79 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 44/85 | 44/85 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/41 | 27/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLLWW
LLLLWLLLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Michal MikulaMikula (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sanjar FayzievFayziev – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Christian LangmoLangmo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Yann WojcikWojcik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luke JohnsonJohnson – Ignacio MonzonMonzon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Pablo AndujarAndujar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Federico ZeballosZeballos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Robin HaaseHaase (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
