Hubert Hurkacz and Albert Ramos-Vinolas will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the National Bank Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT ROGERS. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hubert Hurkacz who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hubert Hurkacz is the pick to win this match.
Hubert Hurkacz -> 1.25
Albert Ramos-Vinolas -> 4.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hubert Hurkacz vs. Albert Ramos-Vinolas
This will be the 2nd time that Hubert Hurkacz and Albert Ramos-Vinolas face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Hurkacz (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Hurkacz won 7-6(2) 6-2 in the 3rd round in Monte carlo back in April 2022.
Highlights Hubert Hurkacz vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas – Monte carlo 14-April-2022
Hubert Hurkacz
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-9 | 11-6 | 6-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 47-24 | 23-11 | 5-5 | 13-5 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-21 | 18-9 | 9-4 | 9-6 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-23 | 22-9 | 1-4 | 8-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-13 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 10, the Pole reached the 3rd round after defeating Emil Ruusuvuori 6-3 6-74 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Hurkacz defeated Ruusuvuori (6-3 6-74 6-2). During the match, Hurkacz scored 105 points vs Ruusuvuori’s 91. The Pole was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hurkacz fired 16 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hubert Hurkacz was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (48/63) of his 1st serve and 60% (24/40) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Pole broke Ruusuvuori 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Hurkacz has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (295-182). 14-6 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hurkacz has an overall142-66 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in in Halle where he beat Daniil Medvedev in the final 6-1 6-4.
The Pole has a compiled 29-13 win-loss record in 2022, 14-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-11 | 0-1 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-37 | 1-8 | 30-24 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-28 | 4-7 | 21-15 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-26 | 5-8 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-14 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 43, Ramos-Vinolas reached the 3rd round after beating David Goffin 7-62 6-2 and Diego Sebastian Schwartzman 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Ramos-Vinolas had a good straight sets win against Schwartzman (6-4 6-2). During the match Ramos-Vinolas scored 80 points vs Schwartzman’s 66. The Spaniard was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Ramos-Vinolas struck 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Albert Ramos-Vinolas lost the serve once and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Ramos-Vinolas put 64% of his first serves in, winning 73% (38/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (12/29) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Schwartzman 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Spaniard hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in in Cordoba where he beat Alejandro Tabilo in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
The Spaniard has a compiled 21-18 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2017, 2018 and 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Hurkacz | Ramos-Vinolas |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
Tot Games | 30 | 39 |
Pts | 105-91 | 162-130 |
Total Points | 196 | 292 |
Winners | 48 | 71 |
%Winners | 46% | 44% |
Hurkacz played 1 match while Ramos-Vinolas competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Hubert Hurkacz lost 1 set while Albert Ramos-Vinolas hasn’t dropped a set so far. Hurkacz has played 1 set(s) less than Ramos-Vinolas (3 vs 4). Therefore, Hurkacz played 9 games less than Ramos-Vinolas. Hurkacz scored 48 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard bagged 71 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Hurkacz | Ramos-Vinolas |
---|---|---|
Aces | 16 | 10 |
Avg per match | 16 | 5 |
1st in | 63/103 | 97/155 |
%1st in | 61% | 63% |
1st pts | 48/63 | 71/97 |
%1st pts | 76% | 73% |
2nd pts | 24/40 | 27/58 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 47% |
Hurkacz struck 16 aces . Ramos-Vinolas managed to score 10 aces (5 per match). Hurkacz won 76% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Ramos-Vinolas won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Hurkacz | Ramos-Vinolas |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 8 |
Converted | 3/9 | 8/15 |
% Converted | 33% | 53% |
Conceded | 5 | 25 |
Saved | 5 | 22 |
% Saved | 100% | 88% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Pole broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Hurkacz had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Spaniard broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. Albert conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
Hurkacz | |||
R2 Ruusuvuori |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-74 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 105-91 | 105-91 | |
Total points | 196 | 196 | |
Winners | 48 | 48 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 16 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 63/103 | 63/103 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 48/63 | 48/63 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Ramos-Vinolas | ||||
R1 Goffin |
R2 Schwartzman |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
pts | 82-64 | 80-66 | 162-130 | |
Total points | 146 | 146 | 292 | |
Winners | 33 | 38 | 71 | |
%Winners | 40% | 48% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
1st in | 45/74 | 52/81 | 97/155 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 64% | 63% | |
1st pts | 33/45 | 38/52 | 71/97 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 15/29 | 12/29 | 27/58 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 41% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/9 | 8/15 | |
Converted % | 67% | 44% | 53% | |
Conceded | 11 | 14 | 25 | |
Saved | 9/11 | 13/14 | 22 | |
Saved % | 82% | 93% | 175% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Montreal
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz (6-74 7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (6-72 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Andrey RublevRublev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (5-7 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Maxime CressyCressy (7-610 7-66) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alex MolcanMolcan (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-3 6-74 6-2) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (7-5 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Andrey RublevRublev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marin CilicCilic – Tommy PaulPaul (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (1-1) – H2H and prediction