![Prediction And Head To Head Jordan Thompson Vs. Ryan Harrison Rchyxp4hnz Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Ryan Harrison](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Jordan-Thompson-vs.-Ryan-Harrison-RcHYXp4HNZ.jpg)
Jordan Thompson and Ryan Harrison will face off in the 2nd round of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jordan Thompson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jordan Thompson is the pick to win this match.
Jordan Thompson -> 1.36
Ryan Harrison -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Ryan Harrison
There is no head to head record between Jordan Thompson and Ryan Harrison since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jordan Thompson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-16 | 11-7 | 3-5 | 2-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Paul Jubb 7-68 6-75 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Australian defeated Jubb (7-68 6-75 6-3). During the match, Thompson scored 120 points vs Jubb’s 118. Jordan was very aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Talking about the service games, Thompson blasted 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Jordan Thompson was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (55/76) of his 1st serve and 52% (24/46) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Thompson broke Jubb 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Thompson has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (370-250). 6-8 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Thompson has an aggregate 207-136 match record in the last years on hard.
Jordan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Surbiton Challenger and the Nottingham Challenger.
Thompson has a composed 22-20 win-loss record in 2022, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Jordan has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Harrison
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 6-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 15-11 | 10-6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-9 | 1-4 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 8-13 | 6-10 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 588, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Yosuke Watanuki 2-6 7-63 7-612, Aziz Dougaz 6-3 6-4 and Christopher Eubanks 7-65 7-69.
In the qualifications, Ryan had a good straight sets win against Dougaz (6-3 6-4). During the match Harrison scored 71 points vs Dougaz’s 55. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Harrison scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Ryan Harrison was quite effective on serve to win 81% (34/42) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ryan broke Dougaz twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Harrison started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
The American has an aggregate 11-7 win-loss record in 2022, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Thompson | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 35 | 79 |
Pts | 120-118 | 268-251 |
Total Points | 238 | 519 |
Winners | 55 | 120 |
%Winners | 46% | 45% |
Thompson played 1 match while Harrison competed in 3 matches. Harrison started his run from the qualifications while Thompson had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Jordan Thompson surrendered 1 set, while Ryan Harrison surrendered 1 set. Thompson has played 4 set(s) less than Harrison (3 vs 7). Therefore, Thompson played 44 games less than Harrison. Thompson scored 55 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Harrison scored 120 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Thompson | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 14 |
Avg per match | 12 | 4.7 |
1st in | 76/122 | 151/256 |
%1st in | 62% | 59% |
1st pts | 55/76 | 120/151 |
%1st pts | 72% | 79% |
2nd pts | 24/46 | 67/105 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 64% |
Thompson fired 12 aces . Harrison blasted 14 aces (4.7 per match). Thompson won 72% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Harrison won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Thompson | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 2 |
Converted | 3/12 | 2/17 |
% Converted | 25% | 12% |
Conceded | 5 | 10 |
Saved | 3 | 8 |
% Saved | 60% | 80% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Thompson broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Thompson dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents twice with a 12% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Thompson | |||
R1 Jubb |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-68 6-75 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
pts | 120-118 | 120-118 | |
Total points | 238 | 238 | |
Winners | 55 | 55 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 76/122 | 76/122 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 55/76 | 55/76 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 24/46 | 24/46 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Harrison | ||||
Q1 Watanuki |
Q3 Dougaz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 7-63 7-612 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 19 | 53 | |
pts | 111-113 | 71-55 | 182-168 | |
Total points | 224 | 126 | 350 | |
Winners | 49 | 34 | 83 | |
%Winners | 44% | 48% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 11 | 1 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
1st in | 60/105 | 42/64 | 102/169 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 66% | 60% | |
1st pts | 49/60 | 34/42 | 83/102 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 28/45 | 13/22 | 41/67 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 59% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 0/5 | 2/11 | 2/16 | |
Converted % | 0% | 18% | 13% | |
Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 3/3 | 5 | |
Saved % | 50% | 100% | 150% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Evan ZhuZhu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alexander RitschardRitschard (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Paul JubbJubb (7-68 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Li TuTu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-65 7-69) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Keegan SmithSmith (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-0 7-65) – See score progression
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Dalibor Svrcina/Petros TsitsipasSvrcina/Petros Tsitsipas (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (3-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Gijs Brouwer/Reese StalderBrouwer/Reese Stalder – Robert Galloway/Alex LawsonGalloway/Alex Lawson (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Govind NandaNanda (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-6(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Li TuTu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alexander RitschardRitschard (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Radu AlbotAlbot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Brandon HoltHolt (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction