Cameron Norrie and Botic Van De Zandschulp will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the National Bank Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on Court Rogers. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cameron Norrie who should win in 3 sets.
Cameron Norrie -> 1.57
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Cameron Norrie vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Cameron Norrie and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Cameron Norrie
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-29 | 11-15 | 14-7 | 10-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-21 | 7-4 | 8-8 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-25 | 14-12 | 18-7 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-26 | 26-11 | 11-5 | 6-7 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 56-25 | 25-11 | 16-5 | 9-7 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 11, the Brit got to the 2nd round after beating Brandon Nakashima 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Norrie had a good straight sets win against Nakashima (6-4 6-4). During the match, Norrie scored 57 points vs Nakashima’s 45. Cameron was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Norrie struck 5 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Cameron Norrie was pretty effective on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 89% (8/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Nakashima twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Norrie has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (299-171). 17-8 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Norrie has an aggregate 191-83 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in in Delray Beach where he defeated Reilly Opelka in the final 7-6(1) 7-6(4) and in in Lyon where he defeated Alex Molcan in the final 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1.
The Brit has a compiled 36-17 win-loss record in 2022, 17-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 25, Botic got to the 2nd round after defeating Miomir Kecmanovic 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Kecmanovic (6-1 7-5). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 61 points vs Kecmanovic’s 41. Van De Zandschulp was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp struck 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was very effective on serve to win 85% (29/34) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Van De Zandschulp broke Kecmanovic 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Botic’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Munich.
Botic has a compiled 27-19 win-loss record in 2022, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Toronto
Van De Zandschulp has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Norrie | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 |
| Pts | 57-45 | 61-41 |
| Total Points | 102 | 102 |
| Winners | 32 | 29 |
| %Winners | 56% | 48% |
Both Norrie and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Norrie and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Norrie played 1 game more than Van De Zandschulp. Norrie scored 32 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch bagged 29 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Norrie | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 12 |
| 1st in | 39/48 | 34/49 |
| %1st in | 81% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 29/34 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 8/9 | 9/15 |
| %2nd pts | 89% | 60% |
Norrie recorded 5 aces . Van De Zandschulp fired 12 aces . Norrie won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 89% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Norrie | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 40% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Norrie broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Cameron quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Botic broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Norrie | |||
| R1 Nakashima | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 57-45 | 57-45 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 56% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 39/48 | 39/48 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/9 | 8/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 89% | 89% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Kecmanovic | R1 Kecmanovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | 38 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | 122-82 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | 204 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/49 | 34/49 | 68/98 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 29/34 | 58/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | 18/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | 8/10 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4/5 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | 160% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Montreal
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-3 6-74 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marin CilicCilic – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (5-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Nick KyrgiosKyrgios (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Daniel EvansEvans (4-3) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Alex MolcanMolcan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-2) – H2H and prediction