Emilio Gomez and Juncheng Shang will clash against each other in the final of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.666
Juncheng Shang -> 2.16

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Juncheng Shang

There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and Juncheng Shang since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.

Emilio Gomez

Emilio Gomez

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
756
High
90
LLLLLLWWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 6-11 0-2 6-9 0-0 0-0 0-0
2023 16-28 8-16 2-6 5-4 1-2 0-0
2022 47-26 38-15 1-3 8-7 0-1 0-0
2021 37-33 25-15 9-11 3-6 0-1 0-0
2020 12-15 2-5 4-6 6-4 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 121 (career-high), Emilio got to the final after beating Cannon Kingsley 6-4 3-6 7-5, Ryan Harrison 7-5 6-4, Nicolas Mejia 6-4 7-5 and Enzo Couacaud 4-6 6-4 7-65.

In the semifinal against Couacaud, Emilio recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 7-65).During the match, Gomez scored less points (7) than Couacaud. In fact, the world no. 121 won 111 points vs Couacaud’s. That means that Gomez was more focused during the important points. Emilio was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.

Talking about the service games, Gomez scored 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve 5 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 60% of his first serves in, winning 63% (43/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (22/46) on the 2nd serve. Gomez broke Couacaud 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Gomez has dropped 2 set in this event to conquer 52% of the points he played.

Gomez has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (339-240). 28-9 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has a compiled 170-96 win-loss record in the last years on hard.

The Ecuadorian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger and the Winnipeg Challenger.

Emilio has an aggregate 32-17 win-loss record in 2022, 28-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Lexington Challenger
Gomez's Record

Juncheng Shang

Juncheng Shang

0 - 0win/loss

Rank
253
High
47
LWWLLWLLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 6-8 6-8 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
2024 42-27 25-10 8-7 2-6 7-4 0-0
2023 31-23 21-14 3-3 0-2 7-4 0-0
2022 40-24 17-8 15-10 7-5 1-1 0-0
2021 18-5 6-3 12-2 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 344 (career-high), the Chinese reached the final after defeating Stefan Dostanic 6-0 4-6 6-3, Mikhail Kukushkin 7-65 6-3, Roman Safiullin 0-6 6-4 7-5 and Aleksandar Kovacevic 3-6 7-65 6-4.

In the semifinal against Kovacevic, The Chinese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-4).During the match Shang scored less points (4) than Kovacevic. In fact, the world no. 121 won 95 points vs Kovacevic’s. That means that Shang was more focused during the important points. Juncheng was quite aggressive to blast 45 winners.

Talking about serving, Shang recorded 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Juncheng Shang lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Shang put 66% of his first serves in, winning 74% (45/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Kovacevic 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Chinese has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.

The Chinese’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Naples.

The Chinese has an aggregate 27-16 win-loss record in 2022, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Juncheng has never competed in this tournament before.

Lexington Challenger
Shang's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

E.Gomez
J.Shang
8h:39
8h:39
Time on court​
8h:39
8h:39
!
2h:51
2h:51
Last match​
!
2h:40
2h:40
4
4
Match played
4
4
108
108
Games Played​
107
107
10
10
Set played​​
11
11
357
357
Total points​
339
339
89.3
89.3
Avg point​
84.8
84.8
138
138
Winners
152
152
34.5
34.5
Avg Winners​
38
38
39%
39%
Ratio winners
45%
45%
-- Serve --
17
17
Aces
7
7
4.3
4.3
Avg Aces
1.8
1.8
15
15
Double Faults
16
16
3.8
3.8
Avg Double Faults
4
4
138/189
138/189
1st won total​
152/211
152/211
!
73%
73%
1st won %
!
72%
72%
75/143
75/143
2nd won total​
67/128
67/128
52%
52%
2nd won %
52%
52%
-- Break Points --
15/44
15/44
BP won
13/24
13/24
3.8/11
3.8/11
Avg BP won
3.3/6
3.3/6
34%
34%
Won
!
54%
54%
28
28
Conceded
29
29
7
7
Avg Conceded
7.3
7.3
10
10
Broken
10
10
2.5
2.5
Avg Broken
2.5
2.5
18
18
Saved
19
19

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Gomez Shang
Match played 4 4
Tot Set 10 11
Tot Games 108 107
Pts 357-332 339-321
Total Points 689 660
Winners 138 152
%Winners 39% 45%

Both Gomez and Shang played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Emilio Gomez lost 2 sets, while Juncheng Shang lost 3 sets. Gomez has played 1 set(s) less than Shang (10 vs 11). However, it’s interesting to notice that Gomez played 1 game more than Shang. Gomez scored 138 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese scored 152 winners (45%).

Serve Performance

Serve Gomez Shang
Aces 17 7
Avg per match 4.3 1.8
1st in 189/332 211/339
%1st in 57% 62%
1st pts 138/189 152/211
%1st pts 73% 72%
2nd pts 75/143 67/128
%2nd pts 52% 52%

Gomez fired 17 aces (4.3 per match). Shang scored 7 aces (1.8 per match). Gomez won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Shang won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Gomez Shang
Won 15 13
Converted 15/44 13/24
% Converted 34% 54%
Conceded 28 29
Saved 18 19
% Saved 64% 66%
Times Broken 10 10

The Ecuadorian broke his opponents 15 times with a 34% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian lost his serve 10 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Juncheng broke his opponents 13 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 66% of the break points that he conceded.

Gomez
R1
Kingsley
R2
Harrison
1/4
Mejia
1/2
Couacaud
Total
Score 6-4 3-6 7-5 7-5 6-4 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-4 7-65
Tot Set 3 2 2 3 10
Tot Games 31 22 22 33 108
pts 105-96 75-60 66-58 111-118 357-332
Total points 201 135 124 229 689
Winners 41 31 23 43 138
%Winners 39% 41% 35% 39% 39%
SERVE
Aces 8 3 2 4 17
Double Faults 3 1 4 7 15
1st in 51/95 39/65 31/58 68/114 189/332
% 1st in 54% 60% 53% 60% 57%
1st pts 41/51 31/39 23/31 43/68 138/189
% 1st pts 80% 79% 74% 63% 73%
2nd pts 25/44 15/26 13/27 22/46 75/143
% 2nd pts 57% 58% 48% 48% 52%
Breaks
Won 2 3 5 5 15
Converted 2/9 3/9 5/10 5/16 15/44
Converted % 22% 33% 50% 31% 34%
Conceded 5 5 4 14 28
Saved 4/5 4/5 1/4 9/14 18
Saved % 80% 80% 25% 64% 62%
Times Broken 1 1 3 5 10
Shang
R1
Dostanic
R2
Kukushkin
1/4
Safiullin
1/2
Kovacevic
Total
Score 6-0 4-6 6-3 7-65 6-3 0-6 6-4 7-5 3-6 7-65 6-4
Tot Set 3 2 3 3 11
Tot Games 25 22 28 32 107
pts 96-79 71-56 77-87 95-99 339-321
Total points 175 127 164 194 660
Winners 38 38 31 45 152
%Winners 40% 54% 40% 47% 45%
SERVE
Aces 3 2 0 2 7
Double Faults 6 2 4 4 16
1st in 63/98 45/64 42/84 61/93 211/339
% 1st in 64% 70% 50% 66% 62%
1st pts 38/63 38/45 31/42 45/61 152/211
% 1st pts 60% 84% 74% 74% 72%
2nd pts 19/35 12/19 21/42 15/32 67/128
% 2nd pts 54% 63% 50% 47% 52%
Breaks
Won 6 1 3 3 13
Converted 6/9 1/3 3/5 3/7 13/24
Converted % 67% 33% 60% 43% 54%
Conceded 15 1 7 6 29
Saved 12/15 1/1 3/7 3/6 19
Saved % 80% 100% 43% 50% 68%
Times Broken 3 0 4 3 10

Upcoming matches in the draw