Lauren Davis and Storm Sanders will face off in the qualifications of the National Bank Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on Court 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lauren Davis who should win in 3 sets.
Lauren Davis -> 1.53
Storm Sanders -> 2.44
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Lauren Davis vs. Storm Sanders
This will be the 2nd time that Lauren Davis and Storm Sanders square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Davis (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Davis won 6-4 6-1 in the 2nd round in Miami back in March 2022.
Lauren Davis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-14 | 3-6 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-17 | 5-6 | 5-7 | 6-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-20 | 16-11 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 14-12 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-21 | 8-11 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 109, Lauren reached the qualifications after beating Laura Siegemund 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Siegemund (6-3 6-3). During the match, Davis scored 65 points vs Siegemund’s 51. Davis was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Davis wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Lauren Davis was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of her 1st serve and 67% (16/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lauren broke Siegemund 3 times after converting 60% of her break points (3/5).
Davis has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (246-212). 9-6 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Davis has an aggregate 136-125 record in the last years on hard.
Lauren’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Bastad.
Lauren has a compiled 19-17 win-loss record in 2022, 9-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Montreal
Storm Sanders
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-5 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-15 | 12-10 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 17-12 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-15 | 10-7 | 11-5 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 279, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Catherine Harrison 6-0 7-5.
In the qualifications, Storm had a good straight sets win against Harrison (6-0 7-5). During the match Sanders scored 70 points vs Harrison’s 51. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Sanders managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Storm Sanders lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Sanders put 66% of her first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Sanders broke Harrison 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Sanders has an overall 13-14 win-loss record in 2022, 7-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Davis | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 65-51 | 70-51 |
| Total Points | 116 | 121 |
| Winners | 24 | 26 |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% |
Both Davis and Sanders played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Davis and Sanders have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). Davis scored 24 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 26 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Davis | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 33/57 | 38/58 |
| %1st in | 58% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 26/38 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 16/24 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 50% |
Davis didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sanders recorded 2 aces . Davis won 73% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Sanders won 68% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Davis | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 60% | 42% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Davis broke her opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Lauren extremely effective on her serve as she has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. Storm broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Storm conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Davis | |||
| Q1 Siegemund | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-51 | 65-51 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/57 | 33/57 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/24 | 16/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Sanders | |||
| Q1 Harrison | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 70-51 | 70-51 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 38/58 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Toronto
- Omar AlawadhiAlawadhi – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sem VerbeekVerbeek – Julien EonEon (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Tatjana MariaMaria (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Cristina BucsaBucsa (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Storm SandersSanders – Lauren DavisDavis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Christina MchaleMchale (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ellen PerezPerez – Claire LiuLiu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Asia MuhammadMuhammad – Donna VekicVekic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Harriet DartDart (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Shelby RogersRogers (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kaia KanepiKanepi – Naomi OsakaOsaka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Caroline GarciaGarcia (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Qinwen ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Elise MertensMertens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Emma RaducanuRaducanu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Alison RiskeRiske (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Venus WilliamsWilliams (0-0) – H2H and prediction