Emilio Gomez and Enzo Couacaud will play each other in the semifinal of the Lexington Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Enzo Couacaud who should win in 3 sets.
Enzo Couacaud -> 1.77
Emilio Gomez -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Enzo Couacaud
This will be the 5th time that Emilio Gomez and Enzo Couacaud face off. The head to head is 2-2 for Gomez and Couacaud (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Gomez won 6-3 6-4 in the semifinal in the Winnipeg Challenger back in July 2022.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 121 (career-high), Emilio reached the semifinal after beating Cannon Kingsley 6-4 3-6 7-5, Ryan Harrison 7-5 6-4 and Nicolas Mejia 6-4 7-5.
In the quarter, Gomez had a good straight sets win against Mejia (6-4 7-5). During the match, Gomez scored 66 points vs Mejia’s 58. Emilio was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gomez blasted 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 53% of his first serves in, winning 74% (23/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The Ecuadorian broke Mejia 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ecuadorian has conceded 1 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Gomez has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (338-240). 27-9 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gomez has an overall 169-96 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Emilio’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger and the Winnipeg Challenger.
Emilio has an overall 31-17 win-loss record in 2022, 27-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Enzo Couacaud
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14-13 | 3-6 | 8-6 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-20 | 8-6 | 21-11 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-22 | 12-9 | 9-9 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-28 | 27-13 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-24 | 5-4 | 16-17 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 203, the French player got to the semifinal after defeating Evan Zhu 6-2 6-1, Keegan Smith 6-2 6-4 and Govind Nanda 3-6 6-1 6-2.
In the quarter against Nanda, The French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 6-2). During the match Couacaud scored 89 points vs Nanda’s 75. Couacaud was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Couacaud scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Enzo Couacaud lost the serve 5 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Couacaud put 60% of his first serves in, winning 65% (35/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (12/36) on the 2nd serve. Couacaud broke Nanda 8 times after converting 53% of his break points (8/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Enzo has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Couacaud’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Bendigo Challenger.
Couacaud has a compiled 25-18 win-loss record in 2022, 18-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd
round in 2015. See his history.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 75 | 57 |
| Pts | 246-214 | 214-151 |
| Total Points | 460 | 365 |
| Winners | 95 | 73 |
| %Winners | 39% | 34% |
Both Gomez and Couacaud played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Emilio Gomez dropped 1 set, while Enzo Couacaud conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Gomez and Couacaud have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Gomez played 18 games more than Couacaud. Gomez scored 95 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The French player bagged 73 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4.3 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 121/218 | 102/172 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 95/121 | 73/102 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 53/97 | 37/70 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 53% |
Gomez fired 13 aces (4.3 per match). Couacaud fired 4 aces (1.3 per match). Gomez won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Couacaud won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Couacaud |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 17 |
| Converted | 10/28 | 17/30 |
| % Converted | 36% | 57% |
| Conceded | 14 | 16 |
| Saved | 9 | 10 |
| % Saved | 64% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
The Ecuadorian broke his opponents 10 times with a 36% conversion rate. Gomez surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Couacaud broke his opponents 17 times with a 57% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | |||||
| R1 Kingsley | R2 Harrison | 1/4 Mejia | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | 7-5 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 22 | 22 | 75 | |
| pts | 105-96 | 75-60 | 66-58 | 246-214 | |
| Total points | 201 | 135 | 124 | 460 | |
| Winners | 41 | 31 | 23 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% | 35% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 3 | 2 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 51/95 | 39/65 | 31/58 | 121/218 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 60% | 53% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 41/51 | 31/39 | 23/31 | 95/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 79% | 74% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/44 | 15/26 | 13/27 | 53/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 58% | 48% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/9 | 3/9 | 5/10 | 10/28 | |
| Converted % | 22% | 33% | 50% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4/5 | 1/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | 25% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| Couacaud | |||||
| R1 Zhu | R2 Smith | 1/4 Nanda | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-4 | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 24 | 57 | |
| pts | 56-28 | 69-48 | 89-75 | 214-151 | |
| Total points | 84 | 117 | 164 | 365 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | 35 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 28% | 39% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 23/34 | 25/48 | 54/90 | 102/172 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 52% | 60% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 19/25 | 35/54 | 73/102 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 76% | 65% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 16/23 | 12/36 | 37/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 70% | 33% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 8 | 17 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/8 | 8/15 | 17/30 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 50% | 53% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 15 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 10/15 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 67% | 22% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Enzo Couacaud/Andrew HarrisCouacaud/Andrew Harris – Julian Cash/Henry PattenCash/Henry Patten (6-4 3-6 11-9) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Govind NandaNanda (3-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Yuki Bhambri/Saketh-Sai MyneniBhambri/Saketh-Sai Myneni – Nicolas Mejia/Andres UrreaMejia/Andres Urrea (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Emilio GomezGomez (2-2) – H2H and prediction