Brandon Holt and Govind Nanda will play each other in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Holt who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Holt is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Holt -> 1.533
Govind Nanda -> 2.43
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Holt vs. Govind Nanda
There is no head to head record between Brandon Holt and Govind Nanda since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Brandon Holt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-31 | 37-24 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 322 (career-high), the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Kyle Seelig 6-4 7-65.
In the 1st round, Holt had a good straight sets win against Seelig (6-4 7-65). During the match, Holt scored 83 points vs Seelig’s 74. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Holt blasted 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Brandon Holt lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Holt put 63% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (16/30) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Seelig 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Holt has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 65% of his matches (94-51). 39-11 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Holt has a composed90-46 record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Cancun,M25 Nottingham and M15 Los Angeles.
Holt has an aggregate 42-13 win-loss record in 2022, 39-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-16 | 17-10 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 433, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Dalibor Svrcina 7-68 6-1.
In the 1st round, Govind had a good straight sets win against Svrcina (7-68 6-1). During the match Nanda scored 77 points vs Svrcina’s 60. Govind was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Nanda wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Govind Nanda lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nanda put 68% of his first serves in, winning 60% (28/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the 2nd serve. Govind broke Svrcina 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Nanda’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Tulsa.
Nanda has an aggregate 18-15 win-loss record in 2022, 13-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Holt | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 |
| Pts | 83-74 | 77-60 |
| Total Points | 157 | 137 |
| Winners | 35 | 28 |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% |
Both Holt and Nanda played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Holt and Nanda have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Holt played 3 games more than Nanda. Holt scored 35 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Govind blasted 28 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Holt | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 0 |
| 1st in | 50/80 | 47/69 |
| %1st in | 63% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 28/47 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 12/22 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 55% |
Holt managed to score 7 aces . Nanda didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Holt won 70% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Nanda won 60% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Holt | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 38% | 67% |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Brandon broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Govind conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Holt | |||
| R1 Seelig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 83-74 | 83-74 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 50/80 | 50/80 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nanda | |||
| R1 Svrcina |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 77-60 | 77-60 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 47/69 | 47/69 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 28/47 | 28/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLWWL
LWWLLLWLWW Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Millen HurrionHurrion (6-0 7-67) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Steven DiezDiez (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Gage BrymerBrymer (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Kyle SeeligSeelig (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Hady HabibHabib (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Evan ZhuZhu (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Keegan SmithSmith – Li TuTu (6-75 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (7-68 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Yunseong ChungChung (6-2 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Mukund SasikumarSasikumar – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (3-6 6-0 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Millen HurrionHurrion (6-0 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Hady HabibHabib (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Keegan SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
