Tung-Lin Wu and Luke Saville will play each other in the qualifications of the Citi Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tung-Lin Wu is the pick to win this match.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.25
Luke Saville -> 3.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tung-Lin Wu vs. Luke Saville
This will be the 2nd time that Tung-Lin Wu and Luke Saville square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Wu (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Wu won 6-3 6-1 in the 1st round in the Jinan Challenger back in 2019.
Tung-Lin Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-22 | 27-21 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, the Chinese got to the qualifications after beating Benjamin Kittay 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Tung-Lin had a good straight sets win against Kittay (6-3 6-3). During the match, Wu scored 59 points vs Kittay’s 42. The Chinese was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wu bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tung-Lin Wu was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (29/36) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chinese broke Kittay 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Wu has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (173-138). 14-6 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wu has an aggregate123-84 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Wu’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Santo Domingo,the Tallahassee Challenger and the Little Rock Challenger.
Tung-Lin has an overall 22-16 win-loss record in 2022, 14-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Wu has never competed in this tournament before.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-20 | 10-14 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 862, Saville got to the qualifications after defeating Bjorn Fratangelo 7-64 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Fratangelo (7-64 6-2). During the match Saville scored 76 points vs Fratangelo’s 69. Saville was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Saville managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Luke Saville lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Saville put 65% of his first serves in, winning 73% (38/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (11/28) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Fratangelo 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Luke has an overall 2-3 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wu | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 |
| Pts | 59-42 | 76-69 |
| Total Points | 101 | 145 |
| Winners | 29 | 38 |
| %Winners | 49% | 50% |
Both Wu and Saville played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Wu and Saville have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Wu played 3 games less than Saville. Tung-Lin scored 29 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Saville struck 38 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wu | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 8 |
| 1st in | 36/52 | 52/80 |
| %1st in | 69% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 38/52 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 11/28 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 39% |
Wu fired 2 aces . Saville struck 8 aces . Wu won 81% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Saville won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wu | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 43% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Chinese broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Chinese was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Saville conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wu | |||
| Q1 Kittay |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-42 | 59-42 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/52 | 36/52 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 29/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Saville | |||
| Q1 Fratangelo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-69 | 76-69 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/80 | 52/80 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 38/52 | 38/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/28 | 11/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWLWWL
LLLLLWLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andy MurrayMurray – Mikael YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Bradley KlahnKlahn (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Benoit PairePaire (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Jack SockSock (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Borna GojoGojo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick KyrgiosKyrgios – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jc AragoneAragone (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Christopher EubanksEubanks (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Luke SavilleSaville (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
