Jasmine Paolini and Clara Burel will play each other in the 2nd round of the BNP Paribas Poland Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jasmine Paolini who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jasmine Paolini is the pick to win this match.
Jasmine Paolini -> 1.42
Clara Burel -> 2.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jasmine Paolini vs. Clara Burel
There is no head to head record between Jasmine Paolini and Clara Burel since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jasmine Paolini
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-16 | 16-8 | 12-5 | 0-1 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 20-16 | 16-8 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 14-11 | 10-10 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-24 | 17-13 | 12-7 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-15 | 1-8 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 58, the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Danka Kovinic 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Jasmine had a good straight sets win against Kovinic (6-1 6-1). During the match, Paolini scored 56 points vs Kovinic’s 36. Jasmine was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paolini managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Jasmine Paolini lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Paolini put 63% of her first serves in, winning 63% (19/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Kovinic 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Paolini has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 58% of her matches (291-210). 6-7 on clay in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Paolini has a composed171-98 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in Palermo.
The Italian has a composed 14-16 win-loss record in 2022, 6-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Warsaw
Paolini has never competed in this tournament before.
Clara Burel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-23 | 12-10 | 6-8 | 2-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-18 | 11-5 | 17-9 | 9-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-29 | 7-7 | 11-17 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-20 | 7-7 | 18-8 | 15-4 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 131, Clara reached the 2nd round after defeating Anna Schmiedlova 7-65 6-1.
In the 1st round, Clara had a good straight sets win against Anna Schmiedlova (7-65 6-1). During the match Burel scored 79 points vs Anna Schmiedlova’s 62. Clara was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Burel bagged 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Clara Burel lost the serve 3 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Burel put 52% of her first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (17/39) on the 2nd serve. Burel broke Anna Schmiedlova 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Clara has an aggregate 9-17 win-loss record in 2022, 7-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paolini | Burel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 20 |
| Pts | 56-36 | 79-62 |
| Total Points | 92 | 141 |
| Winners | 19 | 30 |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% |
Both Paolini and Burel played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Paolini and Burel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Paolini played 6 games less than Burel. The Italian scored 19 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The French player blasted 30 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paolini | Burel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 43/82 |
| %1st in | 63% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 19/30 | 30/43 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 17/39 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 44% |
Paolini struck 2 aces . Burel managed to score 4 aces . Paolini won 63% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Burel won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paolini | Burel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 55% | 83% |
| Conceded | 2 | 13 |
| Saved | 1 | 10 |
| % Saved | 50% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Paolini broke her opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Italian lost her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Clara broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Burel conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 77% of the break points that she conceded.
| Paolini | |||
| R1 Kovinic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-36 | 56-36 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 30/48 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Burel | |||
| R1 Anna Schmiedlova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 79-62 | 79-62 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 43/82 | 43/82 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 30/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/39 | 17/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWL
WLWLWLWWLL Tennis Scores in Warsaw
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (3-6 6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Gengo KikuchiKikuchi (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Shinji HazawaHazawa (6-3 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kaito UesugiUesugi – Jumpei YamasakiYamasaki (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Yuichi ItoIto (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ryota TanumaTanuma – Masaki OsafuneOsafune (7-5 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Ken OnishiOnishi (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Takuto NikiNiki – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-74 6-3 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Renta TokudaTokuda – Sho KatayamaKatayama (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Kateryna KozlovaKozlova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Laura PigossiPigossi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
