Ugo Humbert and Daniel Masur will square off in the 2nd round of the Segovia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on PISTA PEDRO MUĂ‘OZ. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ugo Humbert who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ugo Humbert is the pick to win this match.
Ugo Humbert -> 1.333
Daniel Masur -> 3.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ugo Humbert vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Ugo Humbert and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Ugo Humbert
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-21 | 17-8 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 49-26 | 17-11 | 13-5 | 16-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-29 | 16-11 | 3-7 | 11-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-20 | 6-7 | 1-6 | 4-5 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 25-14 | 11-7 | 4-3 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 152, Humbert reached the 2nd round after beating Gabriel Decamps 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Decamps (6-3 6-4). During the match, Humbert scored 63 points vs Decamps’s 51. Humbert was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Humbert made 5 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Ugo Humbert was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player broke Decamps 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Humbert has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (232-158). 6-6 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Humbert has an aggregate96-50 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Humbert’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Pozoblanco Challenger.
Ugo has an overall 12-20 win-loss record in 2022, 6-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Segovia Challenger
Daniel Masur
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-21 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 16-6 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 192, Daniel got to the 2nd round after defeating Evgeny Donskoy 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Donskoy (6-4 6-4). During the match Masur scored 69 points vs Donskoy’s 61. Masur was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 71% of his first serves in, winning 61% (31/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Donskoy 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Masur’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Trimbach,the Todi Challenger and the Pozoblanco Challenger.
Daniel has an aggregate 22-20 win-loss record in 2022, 6-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Humbert | Masur |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
Pts | 63-51 | 69-61 |
Total Points | 114 | 130 |
Winners | 24 | 31 |
%Winners | 38% | 45% |
Both Humbert and Masur played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Humbert and Masur have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Humbert played 1 game less than Masur. Ugo scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel made 31 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Humbert | Masur |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 3 |
Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
1st in | 33/62 | 51/72 |
%1st in | 53% | 71% |
1st pts | 24/33 | 31/51 |
%1st pts | 73% | 61% |
2nd pts | 18/29 | 13/21 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 62% |
Humbert struck 5 aces . Masur struck 3 aces . Humbert won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Humbert | Masur |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/4 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 75% | 44% |
Conceded | 3 | 11 |
Saved | 2 | 9 |
% Saved | 67% | 82% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Humbert broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Ugo conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
Humbert | |||
R1 Decamps |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 63-51 | 63-51 | |
Total points | 114 | 114 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 33/62 | 33/62 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Masur | |||
R1 Donskoy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 69-61 | 69-61 | |
Total points | 130 | 130 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 51/72 | 51/72 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
% 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Segovia Challenger
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Antoine BellierBellier (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Nicola KuhnKuhn (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Benjamin LockLock – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (7-66 2-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benjamin LockLock – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Fernando VerdascoVerdasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction