Zachary Svajda and Govind Nanda will square off in the 1st round of the Winnipeg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.74
Govind Nanda -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Govind Nanda
There is no head to head record between Zachary Svajda and Govind Nanda since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Zachary Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-21 | 16-11 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 341, the American got to the 1st round after beating Nick Chappell 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Svajda had a good straight sets win against Chappell (6-2 6-3). During the match, Svajda scored 58 points vs Chappell’s 36. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Svajda scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Zachary Svajda was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (28/36) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Zachary broke Chappell 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Svajda has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 56% of his matches (64-51). 13-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Svajda has an overall54-34 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Zachary’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Los Angeles and M15 Fountain Valley.
Svajda has a compiled 13-11 win-loss record in 2022, 13-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Winnipeg Challenger
Zachary has never competed in this tournament before.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 453, the American got to the 1st round after beating Benjamin Sigouin 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Sigouin (6-1 6-1). During the match Nanda scored 54 points vs Sigouin’s 27. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Nanda managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Govind Nanda was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (18/23) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Govind broke Sigouin 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Tulsa.
Nanda has a composed 16-14 win-loss record in 2022, 11-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 14 |
| Pts | 58-36 | 54-27 |
| Total Points | 94 | 81 |
| Winners | 28 | 18 |
| %Winners | 48% | 33% |
Both Svajda and Nanda played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Nanda have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Svajda played 3 games more than Nanda. Zachary scored 28 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 18 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 36/49 | 23/38 |
| %1st in | 73% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 18/23 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 10/15 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 67% |
Svajda made 1 ace . Nanda also fired 5 aces . Svajda won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Nanda won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 57% | 63% |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 75% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Svajda broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Svajda conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Govind broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Govind was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Svajda | |||
| Q3 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-36 | 58-36 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/49 | 36/49 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Nanda | |||
| Q3 Sigouin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 54-27 | 54-27 | |
| Total points | 81 | 81 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/38 | 23/38 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 18/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWW
LWWL Tennis Scores in Winnipeg Challenger
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-2 2-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (6-1 6-73 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jaden WeekesWeekes (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Ulises BlanchBlanch (4-6 7-66 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Brandon HoltHolt (6-2 6-73 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriGenaro – Shintaro MochizukiShintaro (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Evan ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
