Norbert Gombos and Franco Agamenone will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Plava Laguna Croatia Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 6:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 2 sets.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.444
Franco Agamenone -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Norbert Gombos vs. Franco Agamenone
There is no head to head record between Norbert Gombos and Franco Agamenone since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Norbert Gombos
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-28 | 5-6 | 27-15 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-23 | 13-3 | 10-13 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 116, the Slovakian got to the qualifications after beating Fernando Romboli 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Norbert had a good straight sets win against Romboli (6-1 6-2). During the match, Gombos scored 60 points vs Romboli’s 30. The Slovakian was extremely aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gombos recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Norbert Gombos was pretty effective on serve to win 84% (16/19) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Gombos broke Romboli 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Gombos has a good record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (358-279). 22-12 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gombos has an aggregate 157-110 match record in the last years on clay.
Gombos’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Murcia Challenger and the Salzburg Challenger.
Gombos has an overall 26-18 win-loss record in 2022, 22-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Umag
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-23 | 0-0 | 37-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-32 | 1-4 | 28-24 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 145, Franco got to the qualifications after beating Filip Horansky 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Horansky (7-5 6-4). During the match Agamenone scored 82 points vs Horansky’s 73. The Italian was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Agamenone scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 62% of his first serves in, winning 63% (31/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Horansky 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Rome 1 Challenger.
The Italian has a composed 20-20 win-loss record in 2022, 13-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gombos | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 |
| Pts | 60-30 | 82-73 |
| Total Points | 90 | 155 |
| Winners | 16 | 31 |
| %Winners | 27% | 38% |
Both Gombos and Agamenone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gombos and Agamenone have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gombos played 7 games less than Agamenone. Gombos scored 16 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian recorded 31 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gombos | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
| 1st in | 19/43 | 49/79 |
| %1st in | 44% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 16/19 | 31/49 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 14/30 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 47% |
Gombos blasted 4 aces . Agamenone made 1 ace . Gombos won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Agamenone won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gombos | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 63% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Slovakian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Norbert quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Agamenone broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gombos | |||
| Q1 Romboli | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-30 | 60-30 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 19/43 | 19/43 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
| 1st pts | 16/19 | 16/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Agamenone | |||
| Q1 Horansky | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 82-73 | 82-73 | |
| Total points | 155 | 155 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 49/79 | 49/79 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/49 | 31/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 14/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Mikael YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Matija PecoticPecotic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Facundo BagnisBagnis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Aljaz BedeneBedene (1-0) – H2H and prediction