Ugo Humbert and Emilio Nava will clash against each other in the quarter of the Pozoblanco Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10:15 pm on PISTA FABIÁN DORADO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ugo Humbert who should win in 2 sets.
Ugo Humbert -> 1.34
Emilio Nava -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ugo Humbert vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Ugo Humbert and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ugo Humbert
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-20 | 8-9 | 2-5 | 11-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-24 | 18-9 | 5-7 | 11-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-26 | 17-11 | 13-5 | 16-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-29 | 16-11 | 3-7 | 11-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-20 | 6-7 | 1-6 | 4-5 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 157, the French player reached the quarter after defeating Dali Blanch 6-2 6-1 and Paul Jubb 7-5 2-6 7-64.
In the 2nd round, The French player defeated Jubb (7-5 2-6 7-64).During the match, Humbert scored less points (2) than Jubb. In fact, the world no. 157 won 103 points vs Jubb’s. That means that Humbert was more focused during the important points. Humbert was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Humbert blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Ugo Humbert was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (46/59) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Ugo broke Jubb once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Humbert has conceded 1 set in this tournament to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Humbert has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (230-157). 4-5 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Humbert has an aggregate94-49 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Humbert has a compiled 10-19 win-loss record in 2022, 4-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pozoblanco Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-28 | 8-7 | 45-19 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 214 (career-high), the American got to the quarter after beating Antoine Hoang 7-63 6-76 6-3 and Vasek Pospisil 1-6 7-64 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Pospisil, Nava recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-64 6-2).During the match Nava scored less points (4) than Pospisil. In fact, the world no. 157 won 82 points vs Pospisil’s. That means that Nava was more focused during the important points. Nava was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was very effective on serve to win 73% (30/41) of his 1st serve and 58% (21/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The American broke Pospisil 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Shymkent 1 Challenger.
Nava has an aggregate 28-15 win-loss record in 2022, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pozoblanco Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Humbert | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 63 |
| Pts | 158-139 | 206-202 |
| Total Points | 297 | 408 |
| Winners | 66 | 78 |
| %Winners | 42% | 38% |
Both Humbert and Nava played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Ugo Humbert dropped 1 set, while Emilio Nava dropped 2 sets. Humbert has played 1 set(s) less than Nava (5 vs 6). Therefore, Humbert played 15 games less than Nava. The French player scored 66 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio made 78 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Humbert | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 82/140 | 115/203 |
| %1st in | 59% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 66/82 | 78/115 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 32/58 | 53/88 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 60% |
Humbert blasted 10 aces (5 per match). Nava scored 12 aces (6 per match). Humbert won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Humbert | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/15 | 7/21 |
| % Converted | 33% | 33% |
| Conceded | 6 | 15 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The French player broke his opponents 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Humbert conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Emilio broke his opponents 7 times with a 33% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Humbert | ||||
| R1 Blanch | R2 Jubb | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 7-5 2-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 33 | 48 | |
| pts | 55-34 | 103-105 | 158-139 | |
| Total points | 89 | 208 | 297 | |
| Winners | 20 | 46 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 23/46 | 59/94 | 82/140 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 63% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 46/59 | 66/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 78% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 18/35 | 32/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 51% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 1/8 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 13% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Nava | ||||
| R1 Hoang | R2 Pospisil | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-76 6-3 | 1-6 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 28 | 63 | |
| pts | 124-116 | 82-86 | 206-202 | |
| Total points | 240 | 168 | 408 | |
| Winners | 48 | 30 | 78 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 37% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 3 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 74/126 | 41/77 | 115/203 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 53% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 48/74 | 30/41 | 78/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 73% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 32/52 | 21/36 | 53/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 58% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/12 | 7/21 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 25% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 | 15 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 3/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction