Daniel Cukierman and Beibit Zhukayev will face off in the 2nd round of the Nur-Sultan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:30 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cukierman who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Cukierman -> 1.71
Beibit Zhukayev -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cukierman vs. Beibit Zhukayev
There is no head to head record between Daniel Cukierman and Beibit Zhukayev since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-13 | 1-3 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-18 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, Daniel got to the 2nd round after beating Jay Clarke 6-1 5-3 ret..
In the 1st round, The Israeli had a good straight sets win against Clarke (6-1 5-3 ret.). During the match, Cukierman scored 59 points vs Clarke’s 43. The Israeli was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cukierman wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Cukierman conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Cukierman put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (24/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. The Israeli was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Clarke 3 times.
Cukierman has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (142-79). 23-6 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cukierman has an aggregate106-56 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Cukierman’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Akko and M25 Netanya.
Daniel has an aggregate 30-14 win-loss record in 2022, 23-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger
Cukierman has never competed in this tournament before.
Beibit Zhukayev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-31 | 11-12 | 0-5 | 13-11 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-29 | 14-16 | 6-4 | 4-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 507, Zhukayev got to the 2nd round after beating Shintaro Imai 7-63 6-1.
In the 1st round, Beibit had a good straight sets win against Imai (7-63 6-1). During the match Zhukayev scored 76 points vs Imai’s 62. Beibit was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Zhukayev struck 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Beibit Zhukayev was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (30/41) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Kazakhstani broke Imai 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Kazakhstani’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Sultan.
Zhukayev has a composed 25-15 win-loss record in 2022, 18-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cukierman | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 |
| Pts | 59-43 | 76-62 |
| Total Points | 102 | 138 |
| Winners | 24 | 30 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Both Cukierman and Zhukayev played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Cukierman has played 1 set more than Zhukayev (3 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Cukierman played 5 games less than Zhukayev. Daniel scored 24 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Zhukayev made 30 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cukierman | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 12 |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 41/77 |
| %1st in | 57% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 24/35 | 30/41 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 20/36 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 56% |
Cukierman didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Zhukayev blasted 12 aces . Cukierman won 69% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Zhukayev won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cukierman | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 100% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 |
| Saved | 5 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Israeli broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Cukierman pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 5 break points. Beibit broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Zhukayev conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cukierman | |||
| R1 Clarke | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 5-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-43 | 59-43 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/35 | 24/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Zhukayev | |||
| R1 Imai | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 76-62 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/77 | 41/77 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Sultan Challenger
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Dominik PalanPalan (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-1 5-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Shintaro ImaiImai (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Timofey SkatovSkatov (7-64 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- David PoljakPoljak – Akira SantillanSantillan (3-6 7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Ivan LiutarevichLiutarevich (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Lucas CatarinaCatarina (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Benjamin LockLock – Sergey FominFomin (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Yan BondarevskiyBondarevskiy (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Jose StathamStatham (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yanki ErelErel – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Dostanbek TashbulatovTashbulatov (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Denis IstominIstomin (4-6) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PoljakPoljak – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Yanki ErelErel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction