Hady Habib and Gage Brymer will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Indianapolis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hady Habib who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hady Habib is the pick to win this match.
Hady Habib -> 1.41
Gage Brymer -> 2.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hady Habib vs. Gage Brymer
There is no head to head record between Hady Habib and Gage Brymer since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hady Habib
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-21 | 10-8 | 18-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-27 | 38-11 | 17-10 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-25 | 21-14 | 9-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-13 | 31-10 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-4 | 2-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 356 (career-high), the Lebanese reached the qualifications after defeating Ronnie Schneider 7-65 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Lebanese had a good straight sets win against Schneider (7-65 6-1). During the match, Habib scored 67 points vs Schneider’s 50. Habib was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Habib bagged 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Hady Habib was quite efficient on serve to win 87% (27/31) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Lebanese broke Schneider 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Habib has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 66% of his matches (184-95). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Habib has a composed12-7 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Hady’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Kiseljak.
Hady has an aggregate 20-15 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indianapolis Challenger
Habib has never competed in this tournament before.
Gage Brymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18-30 | 18-27 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-36 | 41-31 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 62-35 | 62-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 468, Brymer got to the qualifications after beating Keegan Smith 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Brymer had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-4 6-4). During the match Brymer scored 63 points vs Smith’s 55. Gage was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Brymer scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Gage Brymer was very effective on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Smith twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Brymer’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
The American has a composed 34-22 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Habib | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 |
| Pts | 67-50 | 63-55 |
| Total Points | 117 | 118 |
| Winners | 27 | 30 |
| %Winners | 40% | 48% |
Both Habib and Brymer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Habib and Brymer have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (20). Hady scored 27 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Brymer struck 30 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Habib | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 1 |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 40/56 |
| %1st in | 57% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 30/40 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 12/16 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 75% |
Habib fired 9 aces . Brymer recorded 1 ace . Habib won 87% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Brymer won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Habib | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 67% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Lebanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Hady conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Brymer broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Gage was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Habib | |||
| Q1 Schneider |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 27/31 | 27/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Brymer | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 63-55 | 63-55 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/56 | 40/56 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Evan ZhuZhu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Andrew HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Liam DraxlDraxl (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
