James Duckworth and Jason Murray Kubler will fight against each other in the quarter of the Hall of Fame Open for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Murray Kubler who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Murray Kubler is the pick to win this match.
Jason Murray Kubler -> 1.47
James Duckworth -> 2.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Jason Murray Kubler
This will be the 5th time that James Duckworth and Jason Murray Kubler face off. The head to head is 4-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Duckworth won 7-5 7-6(5) in the 3rd round in the Anning Challenger back in 2019.
James Duckworth
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-29 | 23-14 | 2-3 | 7-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 74, James got to the quarter after beating Liam Broady 6-2 4-6 6-2 and Quentin Halys 7-5 3-6 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Duckworth defeated Halys (7-5 3-6 6-2). During the match, Duckworth scored 92 points vs Halys’s 84. Duckworth was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Duckworth blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. James Duckworth lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Duckworth put 57% of his first serves in, winning 80% (40/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (18/38) on the 2nd serve. Duckworth broke Halys 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Duckworth has dropped 2 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Duckworth has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (284-183). 4-5 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Duckworth has an overall 28-26 record in the last years on grass.
Duckworth’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Porto Challenger.
James has a compiled 7-11 win-loss record in 2022, 4-5 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
Jason Murray Kubler
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 8-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-19 | 10-9 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-22 | 17-10 | 20-5 | 4-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-15 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 102, Jason got to the quarter after defeating Jordan Thompson 6-2 6-3 and Felix Auger Aliassime 4-6 6-3 7-64.
In the 2nd round against Auger-Aliassime, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-64). During the match Murray Kubler scored 105 points vs Auger-Aliassime’s 101. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Murray Kubler scored 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jason Murray Kubler lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Murray Kubler put 65% of his first serves in, winning 68% (48/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 66% (25/38) on the 2nd serve. Murray Kubler broke Auger-Aliassime once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jason has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Canberra,the Little Rock Challenger and the Orlando Challenger.
Murray Kubler has an overall 40-11 win-loss record in 2022, 8-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Duckworth | Murray Kubler |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
Tot Games | 55 | 49 |
Pts | 180-153 | 160-140 |
Total Points | 333 | 300 |
Winners | 81 | 70 |
%Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both Duckworth and Murray Kubler played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. James Duckworth surrendered 2 sets, while Jason Murray Kubler conceded 1 set. Duckworth has played 1 set more than Murray Kubler (6 vs 5). Therefore, Duckworth played 6 games more than Murray Kubler. Duckworth scored 81 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Murray Kubler managed to score 70 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Duckworth | Murray Kubler |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 5 |
Avg per match | 9 | 2.5 |
1st in | 108/168 | 99/161 |
%1st in | 64% | 61% |
1st pts | 81/108 | 70/99 |
%1st pts | 75% | 71% |
2nd pts | 30/60 | 40/62 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
Duckworth recorded 18 aces (9 per match). Murray Kubler managed to score 5 aces (2.5 per match). Duckworth won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Murray Kubler won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Duckworth | Murray Kubler |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 4 |
Converted | 9/18 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 50% | 57% |
Conceded | 15 | 8 |
Saved | 10 | 7 |
% Saved | 67% | 88% |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
James broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Jason broke his opponents 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Murray Kubler conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
Duckworth | ||||
R1 Broady |
R2 Halys |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 29 | 55 | |
pts | 88-69 | 92-84 | 180-153 | |
Total points | 157 | 176 | 333 | |
Winners | 41 | 40 | 81 | |
%Winners | 47% | 43% | 45% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 11 | 7 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 58/80 | 50/88 | 108/168 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 57% | 64% | |
1st pts | 41/58 | 40/50 | 81/108 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 80% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 12/22 | 18/38 | 30/60 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 47% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 4/8 | 9/18 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
Saved | 6/8 | 4/7 | 10 | |
Saved % | 75% | 57% | 66% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Murray Kubler | ||||
R1 Thompson |
R2 Auger-Aliassime |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | 4-6 6-3 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 32 | 49 | |
pts | 55-39 | 105-101 | 160-140 | |
Total points | 94 | 206 | 300 | |
Winners | 22 | 48 | 70 | |
%Winners | 40% | 46% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
1st in | 28/52 | 71/109 | 99/161 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 65% | 61% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 48/71 | 70/99 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 68% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 25/38 | 40/62 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 66% | 65% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 1/3 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 75% | 33% | 57% | |
Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 5/6 | 7 | |
Saved % | 100% | 83% | 92% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Newport
- Maxime CressyCressy – Steve JohnsonJohnson (6-73 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- John IsnerIsner – Benjamin BonziBonzi (7-62 6-76 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Andy MurrayMurray (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – John IsnerIsner (1-0) – H2H and prediction