Mats Moraing and Vitaliy Sachko will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Amersfoort Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on VAN MOSSEL KIA COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mats Moraing who should win in 3 sets.
Mats Moraing -> 1.6
Vitaliy Sachko -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mats Moraing vs. Vitaliy Sachko
There is no head to head record between Mats Moraing and Vitaliy Sachko since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mats Moraing
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 14-16 | 5-8 | 6-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-26 | 4-6 | 6-11 | 6-4 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 31-22 | 2-2 | 21-14 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 25-25 | 10-7 | 10-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 133, Moraing got to the 2nd round after defeating Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Kuzmanov (6-4 6-4). During the match, Moraing scored 66 points vs Kuzmanov’s 58. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Moraing recorded 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mats Moraing lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Moraing put 63% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (9/22) on the 2nd serve. Moraing broke Kuzmanov 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Moraing has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (341-216). 4-7 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Moraing has a composed 127-86 record in the last years on clay.
Mats’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Turin Challenger.
The German has a composed 14-19 win-loss record in 2022, 4-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
Vitaliy Sachko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-32 | 3-4 | 24-16 | 15-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-28 | 3-5 | 14-17 | 10-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
Ranked no. 286, Sachko got to the 2nd round after defeating Andrea Collarini 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Sachko defeated Collarini (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match Sachko scored 94 points vs Collarini’s 85. Sachko was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Sachko blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Vitaliy Sachko lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Sachko put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (21/34) on the 2nd serve. Vitaliy broke Collarini 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Vitaliy has a composed 11-17 win-loss record in 2022, 7-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
Sachko has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moraing | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 29 |
| Pts | 66-58 | 94-85 |
| Total Points | 124 | 179 |
| Winners | 31 | 35 |
| %Winners | 47% | 37% |
Both Moraing and Sachko played 1 match. At the moment, Vitaliy Sachko conceded 1 set while Mats Moraing hasn’t conceded a set so far. Moraing has played 1 set(s) less than Sachko (2 vs 3). Therefore, Moraing played 9 games less than Sachko. Moraing scored 31 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian blasted 35 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moraing | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 52/86 |
| %1st in | 63% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 35/52 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 21/34 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 62% |
Moraing bagged 10 aces . Sachko recorded 3 aces . Moraing won 82% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Sachko won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moraing | Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 40% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Mats broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Mats dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Vitaliy broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Sachko conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moraing | |||
| R1 Kuzmanov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-58 | 66-58 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 38/60 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 9/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Sachko | |||
| R1 Collarini | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 94-85 | 94-85 | |
| Total points | 179 | 179 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 52/86 | 52/86 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 35/52 | 35/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 21/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Amersfoort Challenger
- Max HoukesHoukes – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Sander JongJong (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Arthur FilsFils (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Taro DanielDaniel – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Zsombor PirosPiros (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Ivan GakhovGakhov (1-0) – H2H and prediction