Riccardo Bonadio and Francesco Maestrelli will play each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on CENTER. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francesco Maestrelli who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Francesco Maestrelli is the pick to win this match.
Francesco Maestrelli -> 1.59
Riccardo Bonadio -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Riccardo Bonadio vs. Francesco Maestrelli
There is no head to head record between Riccardo Bonadio and Francesco Maestrelli since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Riccardo Bonadio
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-16 | 1-4 | 17-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-35 | 7-6 | 25-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 45-33 | 2-2 | 42-30 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-33 | 0-0 | 27-32 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 29-15 | 6-3 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 188 (career-high), the Italian reached the 2nd round after defeating Gianluca Mager 6-4 3-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Italian defeated Mager (6-4 3-6 6-1). During the match, Bonadio scored 85 points vs Mager’s 80. Riccardo was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bonadio fired 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Riccardo Bonadio lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Bonadio put 55% of his first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (23/38) on the 2nd serve. Bonadio broke Mager 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Bonadio has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (247-166). 33-18 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Bonadio has an overall219-142 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Bonadio’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Antalya,M25 Opatija and the Bratislava Challenger.
The Italian has an aggregate 34-19 win-loss record in 2022, 33-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Francesco Maestrelli
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-31 | 5-5 | 18-22 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-38 | 9-10 | 16-24 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 44-24 | 5-4 | 34-12 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-18 | 8-3 | 18-12 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 337 (career-high), Maestrelli got to the 2nd round after defeating Daniele Capecchi 6-4 6-2, Alexey Vatutin 2-6 6-1 6-4 and Gilles Simon 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Simon (6-3 6-2). During the match Maestrelli scored 65 points vs Simon’s 54. Francesco was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Maestrelli made 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Francesco Maestrelli lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Maestrelli put 62% of his first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. Francesco broke Simon 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula and the Francavilla Challenger.
Francesco has a compiled 32-14 win-loss record in 2022, 27-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bonadio | Maestrelli |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 26 | 60 |
Pts | 85-80 | 214-173 |
Total Points | 165 | 387 |
Winners | 32 | 81 |
%Winners | 38% | 38% |
Bonadio played 1 match while Maestrelli competed in 3 matches. Maestrelli started his run from the qualifications while Bonadio had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Riccardo Bonadio dropped 1 set, while Francesco Maestrelli conceded 1 set. Bonadio has played 4 set(s) less than Maestrelli (3 vs 7). Therefore, Bonadio played 34 games less than Maestrelli. Riccardo scored 32 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Francesco fired 81 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bonadio | Maestrelli |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 15 |
Avg per match | 9 | 5 |
1st in | 47/85 | 118/199 |
%1st in | 55% | 59% |
1st pts | 32/47 | 81/118 |
%1st pts | 68% | 69% |
2nd pts | 23/38 | 39/81 |
%2nd pts | 61% | 48% |
Bonadio managed to score 9 aces . Maestrelli struck 15 aces (5 per match). Bonadio won 68% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Maestrelli won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bonadio | Maestrelli |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 15 |
Converted | 3/9 | 15/30 |
% Converted | 33% | 50% |
Conceded | 6 | 14 |
Saved | 5 | 6 |
% Saved | 83% | 43% |
Times Broken | 1 | 8 |
Riccardo broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Bonadio surrendered his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 15 times with a 50% conversion rate. Francesco conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
Bonadio | |||
R1 Mager |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 85-80 | 85-80 | |
Total points | 165 | 165 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 47/85 | 47/85 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 23/38 | 23/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Maestrelli | |||||
Q1 Capecchi |
Q3 Vatutin |
R1 Simon |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 25 | 17 | 60 | |
pts | 65-49 | 84-70 | 65-54 | 214-173 | |
Total points | 114 | 154 | 119 | 387 | |
Winners | 25 | 28 | 28 | 81 | |
%Winners | 38% | 33% | 43% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 7 | 2 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
1st in | 34/51 | 42/80 | 42/68 | 118/199 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 53% | 62% | 59% | |
1st pts | 25/34 | 28/42 | 28/42 | 81/118 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 67% | 67% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 8/17 | 20/38 | 11/26 | 39/81 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 53% | 42% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/11 | 5/9 | 15/30 | |
Converted % | 50% | 45% | 56% | 50% | |
Conceded | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 1/5 | 3/5 | 6 | |
Saved % | 50% | 20% | 60% | 130% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Norbert GombosGombos – Matteo GiganteGigante (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (3-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-3 1-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-4 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Norbert GombosGombos (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-1) – H2H and prediction