Pedro Cachin and Mattia Bellucci will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 9:15 pm on CENTER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pedro Cachin who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pedro Cachin is the pick to win this match.
Pedro Cachin -> 1.171
Mattia Bellucci -> 5.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Pedro Cachin vs. Mattia Bellucci
There is no head to head record between Pedro Cachin and Mattia Bellucci since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Pedro Cachin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-26 | 0-6 | 11-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-32 | 4-8 | 28-19 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-22 | 5-4 | 41-13 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-0 | 47-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 98 (career-high), the Argentine reached the 2nd round after beating Nino Serdarusic 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Pedro had a good straight sets win against Serdarusic (6-4 7-5). During the match, Cachin scored 78 points vs Serdarusic’s 64. The Argentine was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cachin fired 8 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Pedro Cachin lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Cachin put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (35/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Pedro broke Serdarusic 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Cachin has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (378-223). 33-10 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Cachin has an overall 363-200 record in the last years on clay.
Pedro’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Marbella Challenger,the Madrid Challenger,the Prague 2 Challenger,the Lyon Challenger and the Todi Challenger.
The Argentine has a compiled 36-13 win-loss record in 2022, 33-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Cachin has never competed in this tournament before.
Mattia Bellucci
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-28 | 27-15 | 5-2 | 5-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-34 | 22-19 | 2-9 | 4-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 66-23 | 30-4 | 25-12 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-18 | 29-10 | 5-3 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-6 | 13-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 323 (career-high), the Italian got to the 2nd round after defeating Gian Matias Di Natale 6-2 7-65, Kyrian Jacquet 7-5 6-1 and Federico Gaio 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Gaio (7-5 6-4). During the match Bellucci scored 75 points vs Gaio’s 66. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Bellucci blasted 11 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Mattia Bellucci lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Bellucci put 48% of his first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Gaio 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Italian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M15 Poitiers,M25 Grasse and M25 Klosters.
Mattia has a compiled 44-12 win-loss record in 2022, 16-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cachin | Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 62 |
| Pts | 78-64 | 230-184 |
| Total Points | 142 | 414 |
| Winners | 35 | 68 |
| %Winners | 45% | 30% |
Cachin played 1 match while Bellucci competed in 3 matches. Bellucci started his run from the qualifications while Cachin had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Cachin has played 4 set(s) less than Bellucci (2 vs 6). Therefore, Cachin played 40 games less than Bellucci. The Argentine scored 35 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mattia bagged 68 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cachin | Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 29 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 9.7 |
| 1st in | 47/72 | 83/183 |
| %1st in | 65% | 45% |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 68/83 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 56/100 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 56% |
Cachin recorded 8 aces . Bellucci blasted 29 aces (9.7 per match). Cachin won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Bellucci won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cachin | Bellucci |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 12/33 |
| % Converted | 50% | 36% |
| Conceded | 10 | 15 |
| Saved | 8 | 11 |
| % Saved | 80% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Pedro broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Argentine lost his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 12 times with a 36% conversion rate. Bellucci conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cachin | |||
| R1 Serdarusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 78-64 | 78-64 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 47/72 | 47/72 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Bellucci | |||||
| Q1 Matias Di Natale |
Q3 Jacquet |
R1 Gaio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-65 | 7-5 6-1 | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 19 | 22 | 62 | |
| pts | 78-63 | 77-55 | 75-66 | 230-184 | |
| Total points | 141 | 132 | 141 | 414 | |
| Winners | 20 | 19 | 29 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 25% | 39% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 10 | 11 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 9 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 23/60 | 26/52 | 34/71 | 83/183 | |
| % 1st in | 38% | 50% | 48% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 19/26 | 29/34 | 68/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 73% | 85% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 17/26 | 16/37 | 56/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 65% | 43% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 5/15 | 4/7 | 12/33 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 33% | 57% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 4/5 | 5/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 80% | 71% | 218% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLLWWW
LWWWLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-3 1-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-4 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Norbert GombosGombos – Matteo GiganteGigante (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (3-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Norbert GombosGombos (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
