Patrick Maloney and Patrick Kypson will square off in the qualifications of the Rome Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.24
Patrick Maloney -> 3.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Maloney vs. Patrick Kypson
There is no head to head record between Patrick Maloney and Patrick Kypson since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Patrick Maloney
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-16 | 16-9 | 7-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 11-8 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the American got to the qualifications after beating Sho Shimabukuro 7-5 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Patrick defeated Shimabukuro (7-5 3-6 6-3). During the match, Maloney scored 92 points vs Shimabukuro’s 80. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Maloney fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Patrick Maloney was quite efficient on serve to win 76% (39/51) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Shimabukuro 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Maloney has a solid win-loss record in the last 1 years having won 67% of his matches (4-2). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Maloney has a compiled1-0 win-loss record in the last 1 years on indoor hard courts.
Patrick has an aggregate 4-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Kypson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-21 | 6-10 | 4-7 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 709, Patrick got to the qualifications after defeating Nick Chappell 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Chappell (6-3 6-2). During the match Kypson scored 66 points vs Chappell’s 48. Kypson was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Kypson recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Patrick Kypson lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kypson put 53% of his first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Chappell 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Kypson has an aggregate 4-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Maloney | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 30 | 17 |
Pts | 92-80 | 66-48 |
Total Points | 172 | 114 |
Winners | 39 | 23 |
%Winners | 42% | 35% |
Both Maloney and Kypson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Patrick Maloney conceded 1 set while Patrick Kypson hasn’t dropped a set so far. Maloney has played 1 set more than Kypson (3 vs 2). Therefore, Maloney played 13 games more than Kypson. Patrick scored 39 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Kypson struck 23 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Maloney | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 5 |
Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
1st in | 51/77 | 34/64 |
%1st in | 66% | 53% |
1st pts | 39/51 | 23/34 |
%1st pts | 76% | 68% |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 19/30 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 63% |
Maloney bagged 5 aces . Kypson made 5 aces . Maloney won 76% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Maloney | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/5 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 60% | 44% |
Conceded | 4 | 8 |
Saved | 2 | 7 |
% Saved | 50% | 88% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Maloney broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Patrick lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Patrick conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
Maloney | |||
Q1 Shimabukuro |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 92-80 | 92-80 | |
Total points | 172 | 172 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 51/77 | 51/77 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 39/51 | 39/51 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kypson | |||
Q1 Chappell |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 66-48 | 66-48 | |
Total points | 114 | 114 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 34/64 | 34/64 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
1st pts | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Malek JaziriJaziri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sam RifficeRiffice – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taha BaadiBaadi – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiranpal PannuPannu – Donald YoungYoung (0-1) – H2H and prediction