![Prediction And Head To Head Mitchell Krueger Vs. Gage Brymer Ksk1bitod5 Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Gage Brymer](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Mitchell-Krueger-vs.-Gage-Brymer-kSk1BiTOD5.jpg)
Mitchell Krueger and Gage Brymer will play each other in the qualifications of the Hall of Fame Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.08
Gage Brymer -> 7.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Gage Brymer
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Gage Brymer since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-16 | 18-7 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 148, Mitchell got to the qualifications after defeating Evan Zhu 3-6 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications against Zhu, Mitchell recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-1). During the match, Krueger scored 102 points vs Zhu’s 89. Mitchell was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krueger struck 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 56% of his first serves in, winning 67% (37/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (21/44) on the 2nd serve. Mitchell broke Zhu 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Krueger has a good record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (329-277). 2-1 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Krueger has an overall 6-13 record in the last years on grass.
Mitchell’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Traralgon Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 19-15 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
Gage Brymer
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 18-30 | 18-27 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-36 | 41-31 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-28 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 62-35 | 62-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 491, the American reached the qualifications after beating Tung-Lin Wu 2-6 6-3 7-63.
In the qualifications against Wu, Brymer recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 7-63).During the match Brymer scored less points (3) than Wu. In fact, the world no. 148 won 92 points vs Wu’s. That means that Brymer was more focused during the important points. Brymer was extremely aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Brymer recorded 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Gage Brymer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Brymer put 65% of his first serves in, winning 67% (49/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (23/40) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Wu twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Brymer’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
The American has an overall 33-21 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Krueger | Brymer |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 26 | 30 |
Pts | 102-89 | 92-95 |
Total Points | 191 | 187 |
Winners | 37 | 49 |
%Winners | 36% | 53% |
Both Krueger and Brymer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Mitchell Krueger conceded 1 set, while Gage Brymer surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Krueger and Brymer have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Krueger played 4 games less than Brymer. The American scored 37 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Brymer made 49 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Krueger | Brymer |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 4 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
1st in | 55/99 | 73/113 |
%1st in | 56% | 65% |
1st pts | 37/55 | 49/73 |
%1st pts | 67% | 67% |
2nd pts | 21/44 | 23/40 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 58% |
Krueger bagged 2 aces . Brymer managed to score 4 aces . Krueger won 67% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Brymer won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Krueger | Brymer |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 2 |
Converted | 5/10 | 2/3 |
% Converted | 50% | 67% |
Conceded | 11 | 8 |
Saved | 8 | 5 |
% Saved | 73% | 63% |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Mitchell broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Mitchell conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Brymer conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
Krueger | |||
Q1 Zhu |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 102-89 | 102-89 | |
Total points | 191 | 191 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 55/99 | 55/99 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 37/55 | 37/55 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 21/44 | 21/44 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Brymer | |||
Q1 Wu |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-3 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 92-95 | 92-95 | |
Total points | 187 | 187 | |
Winners | 49 | 49 | |
%Winners | 53% | 53% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 73/113 | 73/113 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 49/73 | 49/73 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 23/40 | 23/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Andy MurrayMurray (2-7) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Ugo HumbertHumbert (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Jack SockSock (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Gage BrymerBrymer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Brandon HoltHolt (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Feliciano LopezLopez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Noah RubinRubin – William BlumbergBlumberg (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Steve JohnsonJohnson (4-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (0-1) – H2H and prediction