Nicolas Jarry and Hamad Medjedovic will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.85
Nicolas Jarry -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicolas Jarry vs. Hamad Medjedovic
There is no head to head record between Nicolas Jarry and Hamad Medjedovic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Nicolas Jarry
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-14 | 7-5 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-21 | 14-7 | 21-8 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 8-5 | 30-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-22 | 13-4 | 32-17 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-7 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 121, Jarry got to the semifinal after defeating Daniel Dutra Da Silva 6-2 6-3, Facundo Diaz Acosta 7-5 3-6 7-5 and Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna 4-6 6-4 6-2.
In the quarter against Fa Rodriguez Taverna, Jarry recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Jarry scored 99 points vs Fa Rodriguez Taverna’s 87. Nicolas was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jarry scored 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Nicolas Jarry was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jarry broke Fa Rodriguez Taverna 3 times after converting 19% of his break points (3/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jarry has dropped 2 set in this tournament to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Jarry has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (319-210). 25-11 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Jarry has a compiled 260-136 match record in the last years on clay.
Jarry’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Mexico City Challenger,the San Luis Potosi Challenger,the Aix En Provence Challenger and the Oeiras 3 Challenger.
Nicolas has a compiled 25-11 win-loss record in 2022, 25-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 395, Medjedovic got to the semifinal after defeating Leopold Zima 6-1 6-0, Martin Krumich 6-3 6-0, Vitaliy Sachko 6-3 6-3, Filip Horansky 6-1 6-3 and Marco Cecchinato 6-1 6-1.
In the quarter, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Cecchinato (6-1 6-1). During the match Medjedovic scored 58 points vs Cecchinato’s 35. Hamad was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Medjedovic recorded 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic was quite effective on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hamad broke Cecchinato 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Medjedovic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 62% of the points he played.
The Serbian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Ulcinj.
Hamad has a composed 39-10 win-loss record in 2022, 26-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
The Serbian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jarry | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 78 | 76 |
| Pts | 278-243 | 296-184 |
| Total Points | 521 | 480 |
| Winners | 114 | 111 |
| %Winners | 41% | 38% |
Jarry played 3 matches while Medjedovic competed in 5 matches. Medjedovic started his run from the qualifications while Jarry had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Nicolas Jarry lost 2 sets while Hamad Medjedovic hasn’t conceded a set so far. Jarry has played 2 set(s) less than Medjedovic (8 vs 10). However, it’s interesting to notice that Jarry played 2 games more than Medjedovic. Nicolas scored 114 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Medjedovic fired 111 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jarry | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 29 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 9.7 | 3.8 |
| 1st in | 145/226 | 149/240 |
| %1st in | 64% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 114/145 | 111/149 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 46/81 | 53/91 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 58% |
Jarry made 29 aces (9.7 per match). Medjedovic blasted 19 aces (3.8 per match). Jarry won 79% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Medjedovic won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jarry | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 24 |
| Converted | 9/37 | 24/40 |
| % Converted | 24% | 60% |
| Conceded | 10 | 13 |
| Saved | 8 | 10 |
| % Saved | 80% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Nicolas broke his opponents 9 times with a 24% conversion rate. The Chilean dropped his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Hamad broke his opponents 24 times with a 60% conversion rate. Hamad conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jarry | |||||
| R1 Dutra Da Silva |
R2 Diaz |
1/4 Fa Rodriguez Taverna |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 33 | 28 | 78 | |
| pts | 71-51 | 108-105 | 99-87 | 278-243 | |
| Total points | 122 | 213 | 186 | 521 | |
| Winners | 25 | 47 | 42 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 44% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 13 | 10 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 60/94 | 54/78 | 145/226 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 64% | 69% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 47/60 | 42/54 | 114/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 78% | 78% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 20/34 | 13/24 | 46/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 59% | 54% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 2/10 | 3/16 | 9/37 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 20% | 19% | 24% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 3/4 | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 0% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Medjedovic | |||||||
| Q1 Zima |
Q3 Krumich |
R1 Sachko |
R2 Horansky |
1/4 Cecchinato |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 14 | 76 | |
| pts | 52-28 | 58-33 | 61-44 | 67-44 | 58-35 | 296-184 | |
| Total points | 80 | 91 | 105 | 111 | 93 | 480 | |
| Winners | 24 | 21 | 25 | 20 | 21 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 36% | 41% | 30% | 36% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 33/46 | 33/54 | 33/52 | 25/47 | 25/41 | 149/240 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 61% | 63% | 53% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 21/33 | 25/33 | 20/25 | 21/25 | 111/149 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 64% | 76% | 80% | 84% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 13/21 | 9/19 | 15/22 | 9/16 | 53/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 62% | 47% | 68% | 56% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | 5/5 | 4/11 | 5/12 | 24/40 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | 100% | 36% | 42% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/3 | 2/4 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 139% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWWLL
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (4-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Pablo CuevasCuevas (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Robin HaaseHaase (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Fabian Fallert/Hendrik JebensFallert/Hendrik Jebens – Albano Olivetti/Fernando RomboliOlivetti/Fernando Romboli (6-2 3-6 10-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Jozef KovalikKovalik (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
