Marco Cecchinato and Hamad Medjedovic will play each other in the quarter of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.87
Marco Cecchinato -> 1.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marco Cecchinato vs. Hamad Medjedovic
There is no head to head record between Marco Cecchinato and Hamad Medjedovic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Marco Cecchinato
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-20 | 0-2 | 22-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-23 | 1-4 | 12-17 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-33 | 0-3 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-27 | 1-5 | 31-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-17 | 1-4 | 22-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 166, Cecchinato got to the quarter after defeating Nicholas David Ionel 6-0 6-0 and Timo Stodder 7-64 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Cecchinato had a good straight sets win against Stodder (7-64 6-4). During the match, Cecchinato scored 80 points vs Stodder’s 69. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cecchinato fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Marco Cecchinato was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (41/56) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Marco broke Stodder twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 60% of the points he played.
Cecchinato has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (361-257). 10-14 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cecchinato has an overall 321-176 record in the last years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Parma Challenger.
Cecchinato has a composed 10-17 win-loss record in 2022, 10-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Cecchinato has never competed in this tournament before.
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 395, Medjedovic reached the quarter after beating Leopold Zima 6-1 6-0, Martin Krumich 6-3 6-0, Vitaliy Sachko 6-3 6-3 and Filip Horansky 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Horansky (6-1 6-3). During the match Medjedovic scored 67 points vs Horansky’s 44. Medjedovic was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Medjedovic scored 4 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Hamad Medjedovic was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (20/25) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hamad broke Horansky 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Hamad started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 61% of the points he played.
The Serbian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Ulcinj.
Hamad has a compiled 38-10 win-loss record in 2022, 25-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cecchinato | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 62 |
| Pts | 128-85 | 238-149 |
| Total Points | 213 | 387 |
| Winners | 60 | 90 |
| %Winners | 47% | 38% |
Cecchinato played 2 matches while Medjedovic competed in 4 matches. Medjedovic started his run from the qualifications while Cecchinato had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Cecchinato has played 4 set(s) less than Medjedovic (4 vs 8). Therefore, Cecchinato played 27 games less than Medjedovic. Cecchinato scored 60 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian bagged 90 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cecchinato | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 77/105 | 124/199 |
| %1st in | 73% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 60/77 | 90/124 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 44/75 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 59% |
Cecchinato made 6 aces (3 per match). Medjedovic recorded 16 aces (4 per match). Cecchinato won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Medjedovic won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cecchinato | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 19 |
| Converted | 8/10 | 19/28 |
| % Converted | 80% | 68% |
| Conceded | 6 | 11 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 83% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Italian broke his opponents 8 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Serbian broke his opponents 19 times with a 68% conversion rate. Medjedovic conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cecchinato | ||||
| R1 David |
R2 Stodder |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 23 | 35 | |
| pts | 48-16 | 80-69 | 128-85 | |
| Total points | 64 | 149 | 213 | |
| Winners | 19 | 41 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 51% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 21/30 | 56/75 | 77/105 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 75% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 41/56 | 60/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 73% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/9 | 10/19 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 53% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 6/6 | 2/4 | 8/10 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 50% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 83% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Medjedovic | ||||||
| Q1 Zima |
Q3 Krumich |
R1 Sachko |
R2 Horansky |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 62 | |
| pts | 52-28 | 58-33 | 61-44 | 67-44 | 238-149 | |
| Total points | 80 | 91 | 105 | 111 | 387 | |
| Winners | 24 | 21 | 25 | 20 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 36% | 41% | 30% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 33/46 | 33/54 | 33/52 | 25/47 | 124/199 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 61% | 63% | 53% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 21/33 | 25/33 | 20/25 | 90/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 64% | 76% | 80% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 13/21 | 9/19 | 15/22 | 44/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 62% | 47% | 68% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 19 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | 5/5 | 4/11 | 19/28 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | 100% | 36% | 68% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/3 | 2/4 | 2/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 50% | 100% | 159% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWW
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Fabian Fallert/Hendrik JebensFallert/Hendrik Jebens – Albano Olivetti/Fernando RomboliOlivetti/Fernando Romboli (6-2 3-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Jozef KovalikKovalik (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (1-0) – H2H and prediction
