Michael Geerts and Clement Tabur will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Troyes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Geerts who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Geerts is the pick to win this match.
Michael Geerts -> 1.51
Clement Tabur -> 2.56
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Geerts vs. Clement Tabur
There is no head to head record between Michael Geerts and Clement Tabur since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Michael Geerts
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-21 | 8-3 | 7-10 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-39 | 13-10 | 13-19 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 42-37 | 5-8 | 24-14 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 13-7 | 14-14 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-8 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 250 (career-high), the Belgian reached the 2nd round after defeating Jakub Paul 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Paul (6-4 6-2). During the match, Geerts scored 71 points vs Paul’s 59. The Belgian was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Geerts scored 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Michael Geerts lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Geerts put 49% of his first serves in, winning 76% (25/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (17/35) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Paul 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Geerts has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (264-176). 21-9 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Geerts has an overall97-70 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Michael’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Belgian has an overall 28-18 win-loss record in 2022, 21-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troyes Challenger
Geerts has never competed in this tournament before.
Clement Tabur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-17 | 0-3 | 14-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 62-25 | 16-7 | 45-14 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-26 | 20-8 | 16-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-22 | 9-4 | 25-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 11-4 | 6-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 367, the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Theo Arribage 6-0 6-2, Giovanni Fonio 6-77 7-5 7-66 and Andrey Chepelev 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Clement had a good straight sets win against Chepelev (6-3 6-4). During the match Tabur scored 67 points vs Chepelev’s 56. Clement was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Tabur fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Clement Tabur was quite effective on serve to win 76% (32/42) of his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tabur was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Chepelev twice.
Tabur’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Monastir,M25 Faro and M15 Creteil.
Tabur has a composed 30-12 win-loss record in 2022, 9-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Geerts | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 71 |
| Pts | 71-59 | 243-201 |
| Total Points | 130 | 444 |
| Winners | 25 | 107 |
| %Winners | 35% | 44% |
Geerts played 1 match while Tabur competed in 3 matches. Tabur started his run from the qualifications while Geerts had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Clement Tabur lost 1 set while Michael Geerts hasn’t conceded a set so far. Geerts has played 5 set(s) less than Tabur (2 vs 7). Therefore, Geerts played 53 games less than Tabur. Geerts scored 25 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The French player scored 107 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Geerts | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 33/68 | 138/237 |
| %1st in | 49% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 107/138 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 50/99 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 51% |
Geerts fired 3 aces . Tabur recorded 16 aces (5.3 per match). Geerts won 76% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Tabur won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Geerts | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 12/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 57% |
| Conceded | 7 | 18 |
| Saved | 6 | 14 |
| % Saved | 86% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Michael broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Geerts dropped his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Tabur broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. Tabur conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Geerts | |||
| R1 Paul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 71-59 | 71-59 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/68 | 33/68 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 25/33 | 25/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 17/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Tabur | |||||
| Q1 Arribage |
Q3 Fonio |
R1 Chepelev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | 6-77 7-5 7-66 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 38 | 19 | 71 | |
| pts | 53-27 | 123-118 | 67-56 | 243-201 | |
| Total points | 80 | 241 | 123 | 444 | |
| Winners | 20 | 55 | 32 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% | 48% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 10 | 4 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 8 | 1 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 23/42 | 73/119 | 42/76 | 138/237 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 61% | 55% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 55/73 | 32/42 | 107/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 75% | 76% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 21/46 | 18/34 | 50/99 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 46% | 53% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/10 | 2/2 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 50% | 100% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 8/12 | 5/5 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 100% | 267% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWLW
LLLWLLWWLL Tennis Scores in Troyes Challenger
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 3-6 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (5-7 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
