Robin Haase and Marko Topo will square off in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Robin Haase who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Robin Haase is the pick to win this match.
Robin Haase -> 1.40
Marko Topo -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Robin Haase vs. Marko Topo
There is no head to head record between Robin Haase and Marko Topo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Robin Haase
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-26 | 4-5 | 13-12 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 17-19 | 4-4 | 9-11 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 9-11 | 5-3 | 3-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 257, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after defeating Dominic Stephan Stricker 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Robin had a good straight sets win against Stephan Stricker (6-4 6-4). During the match, Haase scored 70 points vs Stephan Stricker’s 59. Haase was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Haase managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Robin Haase was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Robin broke Stephan Stricker 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Haase has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (273-250). 11-8 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Haase has a compiled 138-104 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Shymkent 2 Challenger.
Haase has a composed 16-15 win-loss record in 2022, 11-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Marko Topo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 9-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 26-28 | 8-6 | 12-13 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 4-5 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 629, Topo reached the 2nd round after beating Tobias Kamke 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Marko had a good straight sets win against Kamke (6-4 6-3). During the match Topo scored 65 points vs Kamke’s 50. Marko was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Topo fired 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Marko Topo lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Topo put 48% of his first serves in, winning 78% (21/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (11/29) on the 2nd serve. Marko broke Kamke 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Topo has a composed 14-14 win-loss record in 2022, 8-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Marko has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Haase | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 |
| Pts | 70-59 | 65-50 |
| Total Points | 129 | 115 |
| Winners | 30 | 21 |
| %Winners | 43% | 32% |
Both Haase and Topo played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Haase and Topo have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Haase played 1 game more than Topo. Haase scored 30 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian blasted 21 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Haase | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 35/64 | 27/56 |
| %1st in | 55% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 21/27 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 11/29 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 38% |
Haase made 5 aces . Topo struck 3 aces . Haase won 86% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Topo won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Haase | Topo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 60% | 55% |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Haase broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Dutch lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Serbian broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Haase | |||
| R1 Stephan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 70-59 | 70-59 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 35/64 | 35/64 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Topo | |||
| R1 Kamke |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-50 | 65-50 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 27/56 | 27/56 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/29 | 11/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LW
LLLLWLLLWW Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Robin HaaseHaase – Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Timo StodderStodder – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (6-74 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (7-65 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Jeremy JahnJahn (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Mats MoraingMoraing (7-69 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Julian LenzLenz (2-6 6-3 7-68) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Nicolas KickerKicker (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (1-0) – H2H and prediction
