Daniel Cukierman and Simon Carr will square off in the qualifications of the Malaga Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cukierman who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Cukierman is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Cukierman -> 1.23
Simon Carr -> 3.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cukierman vs. Simon Carr
There is no head to head record between Daniel Cukierman and Simon Carr since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-11 | 2-2 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 430, Cukierman reached the qualifications after beating Luca Margaroli 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Margaroli (6-1 6-3). During the match, Cukierman scored 59 points vs Margaroli’s 34. The Israeli was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cukierman fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Cukierman was pretty effective on serve to win 88% (23/26) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Israeli was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Margaroli 4 times.
Cukierman has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (139-77). 20-4 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cukierman has an aggregate103-54 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Akko and M25 Netanya.
Daniel has an overall 27-12 win-loss record in 2022, 20-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Malaga Challenger
The Israeli has never competed in this tournament before.
Simon Carr
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-20 | 8-12 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-13 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 45-29 | 6-10 | 34-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 630, the Irish got to the qualifications after defeating Carlos Sanchez Jover 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Carr defeated Sanchez Jover (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match Carr scored 102 points vs Sanchez Jover’s 98. Simon was extremely aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Carr managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Simon Carr lost the serve 4 times and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Carr put 66% of his first serves in, winning 68% (49/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (14/37) on the 2nd serve. Carr broke Sanchez Jover 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The Irish’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Osijek.
Simon has an overall 11-10 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cukierman | Carr |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 28 |
| Pts | 59-34 | 102-98 |
| Total Points | 93 | 200 |
| Winners | 23 | 49 |
| %Winners | 39% | 48% |
Both Cukierman and Carr played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Simon Carr lost 1 set while Daniel Cukierman hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Cukierman has played 1 set(s) less than Carr (2 vs 3). Therefore, Cukierman played 12 games less than Carr. Cukierman scored 23 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Carr fired 49 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cukierman | Carr |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 72/109 |
| %1st in | 58% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 49/72 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 14/37 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 38% |
Cukierman fired 3 aces . Carr blasted 3 aces . Cukierman won 88% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Carr won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cukierman | Carr |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 100% | 42% |
| Conceded | 1 | 17 |
| Saved | 1 | 13 |
| % Saved | 100% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Israeli was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Irish broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Irish conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cukierman | |||
| Q1 Margaroli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-34 | 59-34 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 26/45 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 23/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Carr | |||
| Q1 Sanchez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 102-98 | 102-98 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 72/109 | 72/109 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 49/72 | 49/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/37 | 14/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
| Saved | 13/17 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 76% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Tung-Lin WuWu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki BhambriBhambri – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Lukas LackoLacko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Johannes HaerteisHaerteis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simon CarrCarr – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
