Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez and James McCabe will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Malaga Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James McCabe who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James McCabe is the pick to win this match.
James McCabe -> 1.179
Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez -> 4.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez vs. James McCabe
There is no head to head record between Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez and James McCabe since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-10 | 8-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-17 | 10-10 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-16 | 12-8 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Alejandro reached the qualifications after beating Denis Istomin 1-6 7-64 6-3.
In the qualifications against Istomin, The Spaniard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-64 6-3).During the match, Turriziani Alvarez scored less points (11) than Istomin. In fact, the world no. won 89 points vs Istomin’s. That means that Turriziani Alvarez was more focused during the important points. The Spaniard was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Turriziani Alvarez scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Turriziani Alvarez put 66% of his first serves in, winning 71% (41/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (10/30) on the 2nd serve. Alejandro broke Istomin 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Turriziani Alvarez has won exactly 50% of his matches (12-12) in the last 2 years. 7-4 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Turriziani Alvarez has a compiled7-5 record in the last 2 years on hard.
The Spaniard has a compiled 10-7 win-loss record in 2022, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Malaga Challenger
Turriziani Alvarez has never competed in this tournament before.
James McCabe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-19 | 16-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 520 (career-high), the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Thai Kwiatkowski 6-1 0-0 ret..
In the qualifications, McCabe defeated Kwiatkowski (6-1 0-0 ret.). During the match McCabe scored 24 points vs Kwiatkowski’s 7. McCabe was pretty aggressive to blast 10 winners.
About the serving games, McCabe fired 5 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. James McCabe was pretty effective on serve to win 100% (10/10) of his 1st serve and 100% (6/6) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Kwiatkowski twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
McCabe’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Canberra and M25 Bendigo.
The Australian has a compiled 24-14 win-loss record in 2022, 16-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Turriziani Alvarez | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 7 |
| Pts | 89-100 | 24-7 |
| Total Points | 189 | 31 |
| Winners | 41 | 10 |
| %Winners | 46% | 42% |
Both Turriziani Alvarez and McCabe played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez conceded 1 set while James McCabe hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, Turriziani Alvarez and McCabe have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Turriziani Alvarez played 22 games more than McCabe. Turriziani Alvarez scored 41 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, James managed to score 10 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Turriziani Alvarez | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 58/88 | 10/16 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 10/10 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 100% |
| 2nd pts | 10/30 | 6/6 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 100% |
Turriziani Alvarez made 1 ace . McCabe also blasted 5 aces . Turriziani Alvarez won 71% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, McCabe won 100% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 100% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Turriziani Alvarez | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/15 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 27% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 56% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. Alejandro conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. James broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. James was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Turriziani Alvarez | |||
| Q1 Istomin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 89-100 | 89-100 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 58/88 | 58/88 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 41/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/30 | 10/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| McCabe | |||
| Q1 Kwiatkowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 0-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 7 | 7 | |
| pts | 24-7 | 24-7 | |
| Total points | 31 | 31 | |
| Winners | 10 | 10 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 10/10 | 10/10 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 100% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLWWW
LWWLLWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Tung-Lin WuWu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki BhambriBhambri – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Lukas LackoLacko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Johannes HaerteisHaerteis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simon CarrCarr – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
