Hamad Medjedovic and Martin Krumich will play each other in the qualifications of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.22
Martin Krumich -> 4.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hamad Medjedovic vs. Martin Krumich
This will be the 2nd time that Hamad Medjedovic and Martin Krumich fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Medjedovic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Medjedovic won 6-2 6-1 in the quarter in M15 Antalya back in April 2022.
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 395, Medjedovic got to the qualifications after defeating Leopold Zima 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Zima (6-1 6-0). During the match, Medjedovic scored 52 points vs Zima’s 28. The Serbian was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Medjedovic scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Hamad Medjedovic was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Medjedovic broke Zima 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Medjedovic has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (51-26). 22-3 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Medjedovic has a composed36-17 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
Hamad’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Ulcinj.
Hamad has an aggregate 35-10 win-loss record in 2022, 22-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Medjedovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Martin Krumich
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-18 | 0-0 | 15-17 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-11 | 0-0 | 33-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-26 | 3-5 | 23-17 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-30 | 10-3 | 16-17 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 435, Martin reached the qualifications after defeating Sem Verbeek 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Verbeek (6-4 6-3). During the match Krumich scored 67 points vs Verbeek’s 51. Krumich was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Krumich bagged 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Martin Krumich lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Krumich put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (21/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Verbeek 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Czech’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Prague.
The Czech has a compiled 15-12 win-loss record in 2022, 13-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medjedovic | Krumich |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 19 |
| Pts | 52-28 | 67-51 |
| Total Points | 80 | 118 |
| Winners | 24 | 21 |
| %Winners | 46% | 31% |
Both Medjedovic and Krumich played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Medjedovic and Krumich have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Medjedovic played 6 games less than Krumich. Medjedovic scored 24 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Martin recorded 21 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medjedovic | Krumich |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 33/46 | 30/50 |
| %1st in | 72% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 21/30 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 12/20 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 60% |
Medjedovic made 2 aces . Krumich bagged 3 aces . Medjedovic won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Krumich won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medjedovic | Krumich |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 83% | 56% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Medjedovic broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Medjedovic pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medjedovic | |||
| Q1 Zima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 52-28 | 52-28 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Krumich | |||
| Q1 Verbeek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-51 | 67-51 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 30/50 | 30/50 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/30 | 21/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
LLWWWWLLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tobias KamkeKamke – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin CuevasCuevas – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian LenzLenz – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
