Maddison Inglis and Natalija Stevanovic will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on Court 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Natalija Stevanovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Natalija Stevanovic is the pick to win this match.
Natalija Stevanovic -> 1.9
Maddison Inglis -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maddison Inglis vs. Natalija Stevanovic
This will be the 3rd time that Maddison Inglis and Natalija Stevanovic fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Inglis (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Inglis won 6-2 6-1 in the 2nd round in the W60+H Caldas da Rainha back in 2021.
Maddison Inglis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-20 | 24-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 129, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Indy De Vroome 7-68 6-1 and Mandy Minella 7-63 3-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian defeated Minella (7-63 3-6 6-2). During the match, Inglis and Minella scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 129 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Inglis was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Inglis wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and she was very steady in conceding no double faults. Maddison Inglis conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of her first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind her 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Inglis started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points she played.
Inglis has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of her matches (171-119). 4-2 on grass in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Inglis has a composed15-11 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Maddison has a compiled 11-15 win-loss record in 2022, 4-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Natalija Stevanovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-25 | 4-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-12 | 8-6 | 2-4 | 8-4 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 40-25 | 19-10 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-25 | 9-8 | 3-9 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 255, Natalija reached the qualifications after beating Seone Mendez 6-1 7-5 and Despina Papamichail 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kostic had a good straight sets win against Papamichail (6-2 6-4). During the match Kostic scored 73 points vs Papamichail’s 58. Kostic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Kostic was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Natalija Stevanovic lost the serve once and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kostic put 55% of her first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Natalija broke Papamichail 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kostic started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 57% of the points she played.
The Serbian has an overall 22-14 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Inglis | Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 50 | 37 |
| Pts | 80-64 | 140-106 |
| Total Points | 144 | 246 |
| Winners | 25 | 47 |
| %Winners | 31% | 34% |
Both Inglis and Kostic played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Maddison Inglis lost 1 set while Natalija Stevanovic hasn’t dropped a set so far. Inglis has played 1 set more than Kostic (5 vs 4). Therefore, Inglis played 13 games more than Kostic. Maddison scored 25 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Kostic made 47 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Inglis | Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 1st in | 36/70 | 72/133 |
| %1st in | 51% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 47/72 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 36/61 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 59% |
Inglis made 1 ace (0.5 per match). Kostic also struck 1 ace (0.5 per match). Inglis won 69% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Kostic won 65% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Inglis | Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 9 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 9/16 |
| % Converted | 63% | 56% |
| Conceded | 4 | 9 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Maddison broke her opponents 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Maddison dropped her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The Serbian broke her opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Serbian conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Inglis | ||||
| Q1 De Vroome |
Q2 Minella |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 6-1 | 7-63 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 30 | 50 | |
| pts | 80-64 | – | 80-64 | |
| Total points | 144 | 0 | 144 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | ||
| %Winners | 31% | 0% | 31% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | ||
| 1st in | 36/70 | / | 36/70 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 0% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | / | 25/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 0% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | / | 17/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | ||
| Converted | 5/8 | / | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 0% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | ||
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/ | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | ||
| Kostic | ||||
| Q1 Mendez |
Q2 Papamichail |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 | 37 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 73-58 | 140-106 | |
| Total points | 115 | 131 | 246 | |
| Winners | 20 | 27 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 37% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 32/60 | 40/73 | 72/133 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 55% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 20/32 | 27/40 | 47/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 68% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 19/33 | 36/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 58% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/9 | 9/16 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 44% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 4/5 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 80% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWLW
LLWLLLLLWL Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Yen-Hsun LuLu (5-7 7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jeremy ChardyChardy – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-1 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexandr DolgopolovDolgopolov – Malek JaziriJaziri (7-64 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Donald YoungYoung (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Leonardo MayerMayer (4-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Vasek PospisilPospisil (7-67 2-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Priscilla HonHon – Zoe HivesHives (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle LaoLao – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Natalija KosticKostic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timea BabosBabos – Fernanda Contreras GomezContreras Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Lulu SunSun (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Jana FettFett (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Jaimee FourlisFourlis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Su Jeong JangJeong Jang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Christina MchaleMchale (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Catherine HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fiona FerroFerro – Emina BektasBektas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
