Filip Krajinovic and Ryan Peniston will square off in the quarter of the cinch Championships for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 5:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Krajinovic who should win in 3 sets.
Filip Krajinovic -> 1.666
Ryan Peniston -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Filip Krajinovic vs. Ryan Peniston
There is no head to head record between Filip Krajinovic and Ryan Peniston since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Filip Krajinovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-17 | 5-7 | 6-6 | 3-2 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-23 | 4-6 | 11-9 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-12 | 8-5 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 48, Krajinovic got to the quarter after beating Jenson Brooksby 6-4 6-3 and Sam Querrey 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Querrey, Filip recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Krajinovic scored 82 points vs Querrey’s 77. Krajinovic was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krajinovic blasted 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Filip Krajinovic was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (41/52) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Krajinovic broke Querrey twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Serbian has lost 1 set in this competition to win 52% of the points he played.
Krajinovic has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (347-192). 2-0 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Krajinovic has a compiled 9-10 record in the last years on grass.
The Serbian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in Montpellier.
Krajinovic has an aggregate 14-11 win-loss record in 2022, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Krajinovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Peniston
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-23 | 45-15 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-24 | 27-16 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 20-12 | 1-8 | 7-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-26 | 4-8 | 5-4 | 13-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-23 | 25-9 | 12-4 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 180 (career-high), Peniston got to the quarter after beating Casper Ruud 7-64 7-62 and Francisco Cerundolo 6-0 4-6 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Peniston defeated Cerundolo (6-0 4-6 6-4). During the match Peniston scored 91 points vs Cerundolo’s 78. Peniston was pretty aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Peniston blasted 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ryan Peniston lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Peniston put 66% of his first serves in, winning 73% (43/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Cerundolo 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ryan has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and the Ostrava Challenger.
Ryan has an aggregate 21-12 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krajinovic | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 52 |
| Pts | 154-143 | 189-165 |
| Total Points | 297 | 354 |
| Winners | 67 | 89 |
| %Winners | 44% | 47% |
Both Krajinovic and Peniston played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Filip Krajinovic surrendered 1 set, while Ryan Peniston surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Krajinovic and Peniston have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Krajinovic played 4 games less than Peniston. Krajinovic scored 67 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Peniston scored 89 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krajinovic | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 92/150 | 118/179 |
| %1st in | 61% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 67/92 | 89/118 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 33/58 | 30/61 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 49% |
Krajinovic blasted 9 aces (4.5 per match). Peniston made 13 aces (6.5 per match). Krajinovic won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Peniston won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krajinovic | Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/18 |
| % Converted | 40% | 33% |
| Conceded | 11 | 9 |
| Saved | 8 | 6 |
| % Saved | 73% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Krajinovic broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Krajinovic dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Ryan broke his opponents 6 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krajinovic | ||||
| R1 Brooksby | R2 Querrey | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 29 | 48 | |
| pts | 72-66 | 82-77 | 154-143 | |
| Total points | 138 | 159 | 297 | |
| Winners | 26 | 41 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 50% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/68 | 52/82 | 92/150 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/40 | 41/52 | 67/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 79% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 19/30 | 33/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 63% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/6 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 33% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 3/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 75% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Peniston | ||||
| R1 Ruud | R2 Cerundolo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-62 | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | 52 | |
| pts | 98-87 | 91-78 | 189-165 | |
| Total points | 185 | 169 | 354 | |
| Winners | 46 | 43 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 59/89 | 59/90 | 118/179 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 46/59 | 43/59 | 89/118 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 73% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 13/31 | 30/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 42% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Converted | 1/10 | 5/8 | 6/18 | |
| Converted % | 10% | 63% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 5/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 71% | 61% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in London
- Nikola Mektic/Mate PavicMektic/Mate Pavic – John Peers/Filip PolasekPeers/Filip Polasek (4-6 7-5 11-9) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lloyd Glasspool/Harri HeliovaaraGlasspool/Harri Heliovaara – Rajeev Ram/Joe SalisburyRam/Joe Salisbury (7-68 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Marin CilicCilic (0-0) – H2H and prediction