Elias Ymer and Nicholas David Ionel will face off in the 2nd round of the Montechiarugolo for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elias Ymer who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elias Ymer is the pick to win this match.
Elias Ymer -> 1.3
Nicholas David Ionel -> 3.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elias Ymer vs. Nicholas David Ionel
There is no head to head record between Elias Ymer and Nicholas David Ionel since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Elias Ymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-18 | 1-7 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-41 | 10-13 | 24-17 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-32 | 12-11 | 20-15 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-29 | 9-9 | 20-11 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-12 | 1-4 | 8-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 148, Elias got to the 2nd round after beating Gastao Elias 7-69 6-4.
In the 1st round, Ymer had a good straight sets win against Elias (7-69 6-4). During the match, Ymer scored 88 points vs Elias’s 73. The Swede was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ymer scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Elias Ymer was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 91% (41/45) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ymer broke Elias once after converting 10% of his break points (1/10).
Ymer has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (315-240). 8-7 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ymer has a compiled 183-114 record in the last years on clay.
Ymer’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Pune.
The Swede has an overall 20-14 win-loss record in 2022, 8-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Parma Challenger
Ymer has never competed in this tournament before.
Nicholas David Ionel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-21 | 0-2 | 31-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-38 | 7-7 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 66-33 | 17-9 | 48-20 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-33 | 14-4 | 33-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 16-8 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 328 (career-high), Nicholas got to the 2nd round after beating Jonathan Mridha 1-6 6-3 6-3, Andrea Pellegrino 3-6 7-64 6-0 and Roberto Carballes Baena 6-3 4-6 7-66.
In the 1st round, The Romanian defeated Carballes Baena (6-3 4-6 7-66). During the match David and Carballes Baena scored the same amount of points (106). However, the world no. 148 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Nicholas was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, David scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Nicholas David Ionel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, David put 67% of his first serves in, winning 58% (43/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the 2nd serve. Nicholas broke Carballes Baena 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
David’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Marrakech.
Nicholas has a compiled 35-14 win-loss record in 2022, 25-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ymer | David |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 85 |
| Pts | 88-73 | 261-249 |
| Total Points | 161 | 510 |
| Winners | 41 | 114 |
| %Winners | 47% | 44% |
Ymer played 1 match while David competed in 3 matches. David started his run from the qualifications while Ymer had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Nicholas David Ionel dropped 3 sets while Elias Ymer hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ymer has played 7 set(s) less than David (2 vs 9). Therefore, Ymer played 62 games less than David. Elias scored 41 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian recorded 114 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ymer | David |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 45/66 | 173/260 |
| %1st in | 68% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 41/45 | 114/173 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 44/87 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 51% |
Ymer blasted 1 ace . David also struck 6 aces (2 per match). Ymer won 91% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, David won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ymer | David |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 15 |
| Converted | 1/10 | 15/22 |
| % Converted | 10% | 68% |
| Conceded | 0 | 25 |
| Saved | 0 | 14 |
| % Saved | 0% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 11 |
The Swede broke his opponent once with a 10% conversion rate. Ymer pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Romanian broke his opponents 15 times with a 68% conversion rate. The Romanian conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ymer | |||
| R1 Elias |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-69 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 88-73 | 88-73 | |
| Total points | 161 | 161 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/66 | 45/66 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 41/45 | 41/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/10 | 1/10 | |
| Converted % | 10% | 10% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| David | |||||
| Q1 Mridha |
Q3 Pellegrino |
R1 Carballes Baena |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | 3-6 7-64 6-0 | 6-3 4-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 28 | 32 | 85 | |
| pts | 72-72 | 83-71 | 106-106 | 261-249 | |
| Total points | 144 | 154 | 212 | 510 | |
| Winners | 31 | 40 | 43 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% | 41% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 44/73 | 55/76 | 74/111 | 173/260 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 72% | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 40/55 | 43/74 | 114/173 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 73% | 58% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 9/21 | 21/37 | 44/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 43% | 57% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/8 | 5/8 | 15/22 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 75% | 63% | 68% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 | 12 | 25 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 1/5 | 8/12 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 20% | 67% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLWWW
LLWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Parma Challenger
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (6-3 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Borna CoricCoric – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Luca NardiNardi (3-6 7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Gianluca MagerMager (5-7 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Joao DominguesDomingues (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (7-66 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Norbert GombosGombos (6-2 7-67) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Andrej MartinMartin (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (7-62 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (6-3 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Gastao EliasElias (7-69 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Federico CoriaCoria (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Francesco PassaroPassaro (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Carlos TabernerTaberner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
