Caroline Garcia and Katie Boulter will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Viking Classic for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on Court Ann Jones Centre Court1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Katie Boulter who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Katie Boulter is the pick to win this match.
Katie Boulter -> 1.90
Caroline Garcia -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Caroline Garcia vs. Katie Boulter
There is no head to head record between Caroline Garcia and Katie Boulter since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Caroline Garcia
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-17 | 10-10 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-27 | 23-17 | 4-4 | 7-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 21-13 | 11-4 | 4-1 | 10-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-26 | 15-14 | 8-6 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-11 | 5-6 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 74, the French player reached the 2nd round after beating Viktorija Golubic 6-75 6-4 7-66.
In the 1st round against Golubic, Garcia recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 7-66). During the match, Garcia scored 118 points vs Golubic’s 113. Garcia was extremely aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about the service games, Garcia blasted 6 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Caroline Garcia lost the serve 5 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Garcia put 65% of her first serves in, winning 65% (49/75) of the points behind her 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. Caroline broke Golubic 6 times after converting 43% of her break points (6/14).
Garcia has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of her matches (291-224). 2-1 on grass in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Garcia has a composed 33-19 match record in the last years on grass.
Garcia’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Lyon.
Garcia has a composed 9-10 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Birmingham
Katie Boulter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-23 | 24-12 | 3-6 | 3-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-20 | 22-12 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 10-4 | 4-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 16-7 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-15 | 12-9 | 5-1 | 7-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 141, Katie got to the 2nd round after beating Alison Riske 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Boulter had a good straight sets win against Riske (6-4 6-3). During the match Boulter scored 61 points vs Riske’s 49. Katie was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Boulter recorded 5 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Katie Boulter was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (23/30) of her 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Katie broke Riske 3 times after converting 60% of her break points (3/5).
Katie has a compiled 15-6 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Birmingham
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2018. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Garcia | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 19 |
| Pts | 118-113 | 61-49 |
| Total Points | 231 | 110 |
| Winners | 49 | 23 |
| %Winners | 42% | 38% |
Both Garcia and Boulter played 1 match. At the moment, Caroline Garcia lost 1 set while Katie Boulter hasn’t lost a set so far. Garcia has played 1 set more than Boulter (3 vs 2). Therefore, Garcia played 17 games more than Boulter. Garcia scored 49 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Katie recorded 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Garcia | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 75/116 | 30/56 |
| %1st in | 65% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 49/75 | 23/30 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 17/26 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 65% |
Garcia recorded 6 aces . Boulter struck 5 aces . Garcia won 65% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Boulter won 77% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Garcia | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 43% | 60% |
| Conceded | 11 | 3 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 55% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The French player broke her opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Garcia conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded. The Brit broke her opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Brit was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Garcia | |||
| R1 Golubic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 118-113 | 118-113 | |
| Total points | 231 | 231 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 75/116 | 75/116 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 49/75 | 49/75 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Boulter | |||
| R1 Riske |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 61-49 | 61-49 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/56 | 30/56 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 23/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWW Tennis Scores in Birmingham
- Alexandr DolgopolovDolgopolov – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Lukas LackoLacko (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Steve DarcisDarcis (4-6 7-65 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dudi SelaSela – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-3 5-7 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Donald YoungYoung – Jeremy ChardyChardy (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Marius CopilCopil (4-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- David GoffinGoffin – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (4-6 6-3 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jana FettFett – Shuai ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Donna VekicVekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Magdalena FrechFrech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Caroline GarciaGarcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Simona HalepHalep (0-1) – H2H and prediction
