Charles Broom and Daniel Cox will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Ilkley Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Charles Broom who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Charles Broom is the pick to win this match.
Charles Broom -> 1.727
Daniel Cox -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Charles Broom vs. Daniel Cox
This will be the 2nd time that Charles Broom and Daniel Cox clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Cox (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Cox won 6-4 7-6(5) in the final in M25 Bath back in January 2022.
Charles Broom
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-19 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 431 (career-high), the Brit reached the 1st round after beating Gilles Simon 6-4 6-1 and Jason Jung 7-69 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Jung (7-69 6-4). During the match, Broom scored 87 points vs Jung’s 81. Broom was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Broom fired 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Charles Broom lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 65% of his first serves in, winning 61% (36/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (13/32) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Jung 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Broom started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Broom has a fantastic match record in the last 6 years having won 72% of his matches (104-40). 3-2 on grass in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Broom has an overall3-2 win-loss record in the last 6 years on grass.
Broom’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Bath,M25 Calabasas and M15 Heraklion.
Broom has a compiled 26-14 win-loss record in 2022, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
Broom has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Cox
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-20 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 16-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-6 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 505, Cox reached the 1st round after beating Geoffrey Blancaneaux 3-6 6-6 ret. and Antoine Bellier 6-4 4-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Cox defeated Bellier (6-4 4-6 6-2). During the match Cox scored 92 points vs Bellier’s 81. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Cox scored 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Daniel Cox was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (41/54) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daniel broke Bellier 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Daniel’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Bath and M15 Torello.
Cox has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2022, 5-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broom | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 49 |
| Pts | 154-129 | 162-158 |
| Total Points | 283 | 320 |
| Winners | 61 | 75 |
| %Winners | 40% | 46% |
Both Broom and Cox played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Cox dropped 2 sets while Charles Broom hasn’t lost a set so far. Broom has played 2 set(s) less than Cox (4 vs 6). Therefore, Broom played 9 games less than Cox. Broom scored 61 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel made 75 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broom | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 90/138 | 108/166 |
| %1st in | 65% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 61/90 | 75/108 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 26/58 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 45% |
Broom bagged 11 aces (5.5 per match). Cox fired 5 aces (2.5 per match). Broom won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Cox won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broom | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/17 | 7/19 |
| % Converted | 59% | 37% |
| Conceded | 13 | 12 |
| Saved | 8 | 6 |
| % Saved | 62% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Charles broke his opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. Broom surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Broom | ||||
| Q1 Simon |
Q3 Jung |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 7-69 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 23 | 40 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 87-81 | 154-129 | |
| Total points | 115 | 168 | 283 | |
| Winners | 25 | 36 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/47 | 59/91 | 90/138 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 36/59 | 61/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 61% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 13/32 | 24/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 41% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/9 | 10/17 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 67% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 5/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Cox | ||||
| Q1 Blancaneaux |
Q3 Bellier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-6 ret. | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 28 | 49 | |
| pts | 70-77 | 92-81 | 162-158 | |
| Total points | 147 | 173 | 320 | |
| Winners | 34 | 41 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 45% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 54/78 | 54/88 | 108/166 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 61% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 34/54 | 41/54 | 75/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 76% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/24 | 19/34 | 26/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 56% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/9 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 33% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 75% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLWWW
LWWLLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Ilkley Challenger
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jack SockSock – Michael MmohMmoh (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (7-63 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Arthur FeryFery (4-6 7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-0 0-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Daniel CoxCox (0-1) – H2H and prediction
