Borna Gojo and Daniel Masur will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Ilkley Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.54
Daniel Masur -> 2.41
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Borna Gojo vs. Daniel Masur
This will be the 3rd time that Borna Gojo and Daniel Masur fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Gojo and Masur (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Gojo won 6-4 7-6(4) in the 1st round in the Ortisei Challenger back in 2021.
Borna Gojo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 192 (career-high), Gojo got to the qualifications after defeating Andrea Vavassori 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Gojo had a good straight sets win against Vavassori (6-3 6-1). During the match, Gojo scored 55 points vs Vavassori’s 30. Gojo was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gojo recorded 12 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Borna Gojo was extremely effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 70% (7/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Vavassori 4 times.
Gojo has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (166-117). 2-1 on grass in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gojo has an overall5-4 match record in the last 7 years on grass.
Gojo’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Bengalaru 1 Challenger.
Borna has an aggregate 22-13 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
The Croatian has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-12 | 1-2 | 8-3 | 16-4 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 236, the German got to the qualifications after beating Luca Pow 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Pow (6-2 6-1). During the match Masur scored 60 points vs Pow’s 36. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur struck 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Masur was quite effective on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniel broke Pow 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The German’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Trimbach.
The German has a compiled 10-14 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gojo | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
| Pts | 55-30 | 60-36 |
| Total Points | 85 | 96 |
| Winners | 27 | 26 |
| %Winners | 49% | 43% |
Both Gojo and Masur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gojo and Masur have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gojo played 1 game more than Masur. The Croatian scored 27 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel made 26 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gojo | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 4 |
| 1st in | 32/42 | 32/48 |
| %1st in | 76% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 26/32 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 7/10 | 9/16 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 56% |
Gojo blasted 12 aces . Masur recorded 4 aces . Gojo won 84% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gojo | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 100% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Croatian broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Gojo pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Daniel was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Gojo | |||
| Q1 Vavassori |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 55-30 | 55-30 | |
| Total points | 85 | 85 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/42 | 32/42 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Pow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-36 | 60-36 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LL
WWWLWLLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas LackoLacko – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CoxCox – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – Michael MmohMmoh (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Daniel MasurMasur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
