Andrea Pellegrino and Nicholas David Ionel will square off in the qualifications of the Montechiarugolo for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrea Pellegrino who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andrea Pellegrino is the pick to win this match.
Andrea Pellegrino -> 1.31
Nicholas David Ionel -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrea Pellegrino vs. Nicholas David Ionel
There is no head to head record between Andrea Pellegrino and Nicholas David Ionel since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Andrea Pellegrino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-16 | 0-1 | 12-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-29 | 2-2 | 28-26 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-28 | 0-3 | 27-20 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-29 | 2-3 | 22-23 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-14 | 0-1 | 14-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187 (career-high), Pellegrino reached the qualifications after defeating Alexander Weis 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Weis (6-4 6-2). During the match, Pellegrino scored 67 points vs Weis’s 53. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pellegrino made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Andrea Pellegrino lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Pellegrino put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Pellegrino broke Weis 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Pellegrino has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 53% of his matches (211-185). 15-10 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Pellegrino has an overall172-128 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Pellegrino’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Vicenza Challenger.
Pellegrino has a compiled 17-15 win-loss record in 2022, 15-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Parma Challenger
Andrea has never competed in this tournament before.
Nicholas David Ionel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-21 | 0-2 | 31-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-38 | 7-7 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 66-33 | 17-9 | 48-20 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-33 | 14-4 | 33-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 16-8 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 336 (career-high), Nicholas reached the qualifications after defeating Jonathan Mridha 1-6 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Mridha, David recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 6-3). During the match David and Mridha scored the same amount of points (72). However, the world no. 187 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Nicholas was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, David bagged 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Nicholas David Ionel lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, David put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. David broke Mridha 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Nicholas’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Marrakech.
The Romanian has a compiled 33-14 win-loss record in 2022, 23-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pellegrino | David |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
| Pts | 67-53 | 72-72 |
| Total Points | 120 | 144 |
| Winners | 26 | 31 |
| %Winners | 39% | 43% |
Both Pellegrino and David played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nicholas David Ionel dropped 1 set while Andrea Pellegrino hasn’t dropped a set so far. Pellegrino has played 1 set(s) less than David (2 vs 3). Therefore, Pellegrino played 7 games less than David. Pellegrino scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Nicholas fired 31 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pellegrino | David |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 44/73 |
| %1st in | 63% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 31/44 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 14/29 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 48% |
Pellegrino blasted 6 aces . David blasted 2 aces . Pellegrino won 68% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, David won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pellegrino | David |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 44% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Pellegrino broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Pellegrino conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Romanian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Nicholas conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pellegrino | |||
| Q1 Weis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-53 | 67-53 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 38/60 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| David | |||
| Q1 Mridha |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 72-72 | 72-72 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 44/73 | 44/73 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 14/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLWLWLWL
LLWWWLWLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrej MartinMartin – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Elias YmerYmer (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Hugo DellienDellien (0-0) – H2H and prediction
