Kamilla Rakhimova and Alycia Parks will clash against each other in the qualifications of the bett1open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 10:30 am on Court 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamilla Rakhimova who should win in 3 sets.
Kamilla Rakhimova -> 1.73
Alycia Parks -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kamilla Rakhimova vs. Alycia Parks
This will be the 2nd time that Kamilla Rakhimova and Alycia Parks clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Parks (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Parks won 6-3 6-4 in the qualifications in Miami back in March 2022.
Kamilla Rakhimova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-33 | 12-21 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-34 | 26-23 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-30 | 20-14 | 11-11 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-27 | 14-12 | 6-10 | 10-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-22 | 9-7 | 10-7 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 107, Rakhimova got to the qualifications after defeating Isabella Shinikova 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Rakhimova had a good straight sets win against Shinikova (6-3 6-4). During the match, Rakhimova scored 64 points vs Shinikova’s 48. The Russian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rakhimova blasted 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Kamilla Rakhimova was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (24/34) of her 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Rakhimova broke Shinikova 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Rakhimova has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of her matches (124-76). 1-0 on grass in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Rakhimova has a composed2-2 win-loss record in the last 6 years on grass.
Rakhimova’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Bogota.
Kamilla has a composed 12-15 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Berlin
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
Alycia Parks
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-30 | 17-19 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-31 | 14-18 | 2-7 | 12-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-28 | 7-13 | 6-9 | 8-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-30 | 11-15 | 7-9 | 14-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-27 | 10-13 | 15-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Ulrikke Eikeri 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Alycia had a good straight sets win against Eikeri (6-3 6-4). During the match Parks scored 66 points vs Eikeri’s 54. Parks was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Parks scored 18 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Alycia Parks was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (28/36) of her 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Alycia broke Eikeri twice after converting 29% of her break points (2/7).
Parks’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the W60 Rome and the W60 Arcadia.
Parks has an aggregate 15-17 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rakhimova | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 |
| Pts | 64-48 | 66-54 |
| Total Points | 112 | 120 |
| Winners | 24 | 28 |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% |
Both Rakhimova and Parks played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Rakhimova and Parks have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (19). Kamilla scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 28 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rakhimova | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 18 |
| 1st in | 34/54 | 36/52 |
| %1st in | 63% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 28/36 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/16 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 75% |
Rakhimova bagged 2 aces . Parks blasted 18 aces . Rakhimova won 71% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Parks won 78% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rakhimova | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 29% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 60% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Russian broke her opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kamilla conceded her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Rakhimova | |||
| Q1 Shinikova | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 64-48 | 64-48 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/54 | 34/54 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 24/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Parks | |||
| Q1 Eikeri | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 66-54 | 66-54 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/52 | 36/52 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Berlin
- John-Patrick SmithSmith – Mikhail ElginElgin (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Liam BroadyBroady – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-1 2-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel MasurMasur – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ekaterina Makarova (1996)Makarova (1996) – Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Sabine LisickiLisicki (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Storm SandersSanders (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Alycia ParksParks (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (1-0) – H2H and prediction