Steve Johnson and Paul Jubb will fight against each other in the qualifications of the cinch Championships for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Steve Johnson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Steve Johnson is the pick to win this match.
Steve Johnson -> 1.43
Paul Jubb -> 2.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Steve Johnson vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Steve Johnson and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Steve Johnson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-20 | 15-11 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-28 | 20-18 | 6-4 | 2-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-17 | 8-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-11 | 18-7 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 87, Johnson reached the qualifications after beating Stefan Kozlov 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Steve had a good straight sets win against Kozlov (6-0 6-0). During the match, Johnson scored 54 points vs Kozlov’s 21. The American was quite aggressive to blast 12 winners.
Regarding the service games, Johnson made 4 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Steve Johnson was quite effective on serve to win 71% (12/17) of his 1st serve and 75% (15/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Steve broke Kozlov 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Johnson has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (274-223). 1-0 on grass in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Johnson has a composed 41-29 record in the last years on grass.
Steve’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Sarasota Challenger.
The American has a composed 16-12 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 231, Jubb got to the qualifications after defeating James Duckworth 7-60 4-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, Jubb defeated Duckworth (7-60 4-6 6-1). During the match Jubb scored 107 points vs Duckworth’s 94. Paul was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb blasted 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (43/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the 2nd serve. Paul broke Duckworth 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Brit’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger.
Jubb has an overall 19-10 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in London
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Johnson | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 30 |
| Pts | 54-21 | 107-94 |
| Total Points | 75 | 201 |
| Winners | 12 | 43 |
| %Winners | 22% | 40% |
Both Johnson and Jubb played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Paul Jubb lost 1 set while Steve Johnson hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Johnson has played 1 set(s) less than Jubb (2 vs 3). Therefore, Johnson played 18 games less than Jubb. Steve scored 12 winners (22% of the total points). On the other side, Paul bagged 43 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Johnson | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 10 |
| 1st in | 17/37 | 63/100 |
| %1st in | 46% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 12/17 | 43/63 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 19/37 |
| %2nd pts | 75% | 51% |
Johnson managed to score 4 aces . Jubb scored 10 aces . Johnson won 71% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Johnson | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/7 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 86% | 57% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. Steve very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Jubb broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Johnson | |||
| Q1 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 54-21 | 54-21 | |
| Total points | 75 | 75 | |
| Winners | 12 | 12 | |
| %Winners | 22% | 22% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 17/37 | 17/37 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 15/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Jubb | |||
| Q1 Duckworth |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-60 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 107-94 | 107-94 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 63/100 | 63/100 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 43/63 | 43/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/37 | 19/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWW
LLWLWWLWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andy MurrayMurray – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Cameron NorrieNorrie (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Quentin HalysHalys (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Marin CilicCilic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Tommy PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Feliciano LopezLopez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Alexander BublikBublik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
