Jason Murray Kubler and Ulises Blanch will square off in the quarter of the Orlando Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Murray Kubler who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Murray Kubler is the pick to win this match.
Jason Murray Kubler -> 1.23
Ulises Blanch -> 4.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Murray Kubler vs. Ulises Blanch
There is no head to head record between Jason Murray Kubler and Ulises Blanch since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jason Murray Kubler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-19 | 10-9 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-22 | 17-10 | 20-5 | 4-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-15 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 119, Jason got to the quarter after beating Keegan Smith 6-2 6-2 and Nicolas Mejia 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Jason had a good straight sets win against Mejia (6-2 6-1). During the match, Murray Kubler scored 58 points vs Mejia’s 32. Murray Kubler was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Murray Kubler blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jason Murray Kubler was quite efficient on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 70% (7/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Murray Kubler broke Mejia 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 61% of the points he played.
Murray Kubler has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 68% of his matches (281-130). 10-4 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Murray Kubler has an overall 105-46 record in the last years on hard.
Murray Kubler’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Canberra and the Little Rock Challenger.
The Australian has an aggregate 30-9 win-loss record in 2022, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orlando Challenger
Ulises Blanch
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 10-4 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-23 | 14-11 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-29 | 10-12 | 6-5 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 16-21 | 11-13 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-15 | 7-6 | 3-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 308, the American got to the quarter after beating Gilbert Klier Junior 7-65 6-4 and Rinky Hijikata 6-0 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Blanch defeated Hijikata (6-0 3-6 6-3). During the match Blanch scored 85 points vs Hijikata’s 72. Ulises was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Blanch struck 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Ulises Blanch was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ulises broke Hijikata 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Blanch’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Shymkent 1 Challenger.
The American has a composed 16-14 win-loss record in 2022, 6-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Murray Kubler | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 47 |
| Pts | 114-72 | 161-148 |
| Total Points | 186 | 309 |
| Winners | 48 | 65 |
| %Winners | 42% | 40% |
Both Murray Kubler and Blanch played 2 matches. At the moment, Ulises Blanch surrendered 1 set while Jason Murray Kubler hasn’t lost a set so far. Murray Kubler has played 1 set(s) less than Blanch (4 vs 5). Therefore, Murray Kubler played 16 games less than Blanch. Murray Kubler scored 48 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Blanch made 65 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Murray Kubler | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 58/81 | 92/165 |
| %1st in | 72% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 48/58 | 65/92 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 42/73 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 58% |
Murray Kubler managed to score 5 aces (2.5 per match). Blanch struck 11 aces (5.5 per match). Murray Kubler won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Blanch won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Murray Kubler | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 6 |
| Converted | 9/21 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 43% | 67% |
| Conceded | 1 | 14 |
| Saved | 1 | 12 |
| % Saved | 100% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. Murray Kubler had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. The American broke his opponents 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Ulises conceded his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Murray Kubler | ||||
| R1 Smith |
R2 Mejia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 31 | |
| pts | 56-40 | 58-32 | 114-72 | |
| Total points | 96 | 90 | 186 | |
| Winners | 27 | 21 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 36% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/46 | 25/35 | 58/81 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 71% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 21/25 | 48/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 84% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/13 | 7/10 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 70% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/10 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 50% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Blanch | ||||
| R1 Klier |
R2 Hijikata |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 24 | 47 | |
| pts | 76-76 | 85-72 | 161-148 | |
| Total points | 152 | 157 | 309 | |
| Winners | 32 | 33 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 50/87 | 42/78 | 92/165 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 54% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 33/42 | 65/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 79% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/37 | 20/36 | 42/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 56% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 4/7 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 57% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 3/4 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 75% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLW
LLLLLWLWWW Tennis Scores in Orlando Challenger
- Andrew Harris/Christian HarrisonHarris/Christian Harrison – Yibing Wu/Zhizhen ZhangWu/Zhizhen Zhang (7-66 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Emilio GomezGomez (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
