Ilya Ivashka and Emil Ruusuvuori will square off in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ilya Ivashka who should win in 3 sets.
Ilya Ivashka -> 1.68
Emil Ruusuvuori -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ilya Ivashka vs. Emil Ruusuvuori
This will be the 5th time that Ilya Ivashka and Emil Ruusuvuori square off. The head to head is 3-1 for Ivashka (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Ivashka won 4-6 6-4 6-1 in the quarter in Nur sultan back in 2021.
Ilya Ivashka
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 12-24 | 5-12 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-24 | 8-6 | 5-7 | 6-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 43-20 | 14-6 | 13-5 | 6-4 | 10-5 | 0-0 |
2020 | 28-13 | 12-4 | 3-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 49, Ivashka got to the 2nd round after beating Mackenzie Mcdonald 6-3 6-78 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Belarussian defeated Mcdonald (6-3 6-78 6-1). During the match, Ivashka scored 107 points vs Mcdonald’s 81. The Belarussian was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ivashka recorded 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ilya Ivashka was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 89% (50/56) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ivashka broke Mcdonald 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Ivashka has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (332-207). 1-0 on grass in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ivashka has an aggregate 16-12 record in the last years on grass.
The Belarussian has a compiled 9-11 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Emil Ruusuvuori
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-16 | 8-6 | 2-5 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-30 | 13-11 | 6-7 | 9-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-32 | 15-12 | 10-9 | 10-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-26 | 21-12 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 27-15 | 11-5 | 0-2 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 62, the Finn got to the 2nd round after beating Botic Van De Zandschulp 4-6 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round against Van De Zandschulp, The Finn recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-1). During the match Ruusuvuori scored 85 points vs Van De Zandschulp’s 64. The Finn was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Ruusuvuori managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Emil Ruusuvuori lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Ruusuvuori put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the 2nd serve. Emil broke Van De Zandschulp 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Emil’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Pune.
Ruusuvuori has an overall 22-15 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ivashka | Ruusuvuori |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 29 | 25 |
Pts | 107-81 | 85-64 |
Total Points | 188 | 149 |
Winners | 50 | 35 |
%Winners | 47% | 41% |
Both Ivashka and Ruusuvuori played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Ilya Ivashka surrendered 1 set, while Emil Ruusuvuori conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Ivashka and Ruusuvuori have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Ivashka played 4 games more than Ruusuvuori. Ilya scored 50 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Emil bagged 35 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ivashka | Ruusuvuori |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 3 |
Avg per match | 9 | 3 |
1st in | 56/90 | 50/76 |
%1st in | 62% | 66% |
1st pts | 50/56 | 35/50 |
%1st pts | 89% | 70% |
2nd pts | 19/34 | 16/26 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 62% |
Ivashka blasted 9 aces . Ruusuvuori fired 3 aces . Ivashka won 89% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Ruusuvuori won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ivashka | Ruusuvuori |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 5 |
Converted | 3/12 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 25% | 71% |
Conceded | 2 | 10 |
Saved | 2 | 8 |
% Saved | 100% | 80% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Ilya broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Belarussian very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Finn broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Emil conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Ivashka | |||
R1 Mcdonald | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-78 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 107-81 | 107-81 | |
Total points | 188 | 188 | |
Winners | 50 | 50 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 56/90 | 56/90 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 50/56 | 50/56 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Ruusuvuori | |||
R1 Van De Zandschulp | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 85-64 | 85-64 | |
Total points | 149 | 149 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 50/76 | 50/76 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Robin HaaseHaase (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-3 6-78 6-1) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Aljaz BedeneBedene (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Tommy PaulPaul (6-74 7-65 7-62) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (4-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Matthew EbdenEbden (7-64 7-69) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Andreas SeppiSeppi (7-64 7-69) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Jesper De JongDe Jong (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Gilles SimonSimon (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction