Tamara Zidansek and Caty McNally will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Caty McNally who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Caty McNally is the pick to win this match.
Caty McNally -> 1.86
Tamara Zidansek -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tamara Zidansek vs. Caty McNally
This will be the 2nd time that Tamara Zidansek and Caty McNally fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for McNally (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, McNally won 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 in the 2nd round in Guadalajara back in 2021.
Highlights Caty McNally vs Tamara Zidansek – Guadalajara 10-March-2021
Tamara Zidansek
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-25 | 6-10 | 12-11 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-26 | 7-8 | 27-11 | 6-4 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 21-24 | 12-9 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-20 | 9-13 | 21-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-13 | 5-5 | 1-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 59, Zidansek got to the 2nd round after defeating Harmony Tan 1-6 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round against Tan, The Slovenian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Zidansek scored 75 points vs Tan’s 67. Tamara was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zidansek scored just 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 3 double faults. Tamara Zidansek lost the serve 5 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Zidansek put 62% of her first serves in, winning 61% (25/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Zidansek was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Tan 6 times.
Zidansek has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 67% of her matches (265-129). 1-0 on grass in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Zidansek has a composed5-5 record in the last 8 years on grass.
Tamara’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in Adelaide.
Zidansek has a composed 10-9 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
The Slovenian has never competed in this tournament before.
Caty McNally
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-5 | 2-2 | 5-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-13 | 5-6 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 7-9 | 1-6 | 17-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-20 | 10-11 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-14 | 9-9 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 229, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Lizette Cabrera 2-6 6-4 6-4, Valentini Grammatikopoulou 6-1 6-2 and Daria Saville 7-63 6-3.
In the 1st round, Caty had a good straight sets win against Gavrilova (7-63 6-3). During the match McNally scored 84 points vs Gavrilova’s 75. Caty was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, McNally recorded 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Caty McNally lost the serve 3 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, McNally put 70% of her first serves in, winning 58% (33/57) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Gavrilova 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Caty has a compiled 9-12 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zidansek | McNally |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 65 |
| Pts | 75-67 | 232-197 |
| Total Points | 142 | 429 |
| Winners | 25 | 89 |
| %Winners | 33% | 38% |
Zidansek played 1 match while McNally competed in 3 matches. McNally started her run from the qualifications while Zidansek had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Tamara Zidansek lost 1 set, while Caty McNally lost 1 set. Zidansek has played 4 set(s) less than McNally (3 vs 7). Therefore, Zidansek played 40 games less than McNally. Tamara scored 25 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Caty bagged 89 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zidansek | McNally |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 41/66 | 142/208 |
| %1st in | 62% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 25/41 | 89/142 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 31/66 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 47% |
Zidansek fired 1 ace . McNally also managed to score 5 aces (1.7 per match). Zidansek won 61% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, McNally won 63% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zidansek | McNally |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 16 |
| Converted | 6/6 | 16/30 |
| % Converted | 100% | 53% |
| Conceded | 7 | 23 |
| Saved | 2 | 13 |
| % Saved | 29% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 10 |
The Slovenian broke her opponent 6 times with a 100% conversion rate. Tamara lost her serve 5 times and she saved 29% of the break points that she conceded. Caty broke her opponents 16 times with a 53% conversion rate. McNally conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
| Zidansek | |||
| R1 Tan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 75-67 | 75-67 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/66 | 41/66 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 25/41 | 25/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| McNally | |||||
| Q1 Cabrera |
Q3 Grammatikopoulou |
R1 Gavrilova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 15 | 22 | 65 | |
| pts | 93-97 | 55-25 | 84-75 | 232-197 | |
| Total points | 190 | 80 | 159 | 429 | |
| Winners | 34 | 22 | 33 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 40% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 2 | 2 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 57/92 | 28/35 | 57/81 | 142/208 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 80% | 70% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 34/57 | 22/28 | 33/57 | 89/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 79% | 58% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/35 | 3/7 | 14/24 | 31/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 43% | 58% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 4 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/8 | 4/10 | 16/30 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 40% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 1 | 9 | 23 | |
| Saved | 7/13 | 0/1 | 6/9 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 54% | 0% | 67% | 121% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLWLL
WWWWWLWLWL Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Benoit PairePaire – Marcel GranollersGranollers (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Gilles MullerMuller (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- David GoffinGoffin – Nicolas AlmagroAlmagro (3-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Nicolas MahutMahut (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marius CopilCopil – Lucas PouillePouille (7-64 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Denis IstominIstomin – Yannick MadenMaden (6-3 6-76 7-60) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Gilles SimonSimon (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck – Elise MertensMertens (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Shelby RogersRogers (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kirsten FlipkensFlipkens – Ann LiLi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Belinda BencicBencic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
