Marc-Andrea Huesler and Daniel Cox will square off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc-Andrea Huesler who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc-Andrea Huesler is the pick to win this match.
Marc-Andrea Huesler -> 1.4
Daniel Cox -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc-Andrea Huesler vs. Daniel Cox
There is no head to head record between Marc-Andrea Huesler and Daniel Cox since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Marc-Andrea Huesler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-27 | 14-11 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-28 | 11-6 | 16-10 | 10-9 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-31 | 7-9 | 2-10 | 5-8 | 4-3 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 45-28 | 9-8 | 18-6 | 11-10 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-33 | 3-6 | 14-15 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 3-2 |
Ranked no. 123, Marc-Andrea got to the 2nd round after beating Ernesto Escobedo 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Huesler had a good straight sets win against Escobedo (6-4 6-4). During the match, Huesler scored 70 points vs Escobedo’s 54. The Swiss was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Huesler fired 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marc-Andrea Huesler was very efficient on serve to win 88% (30/34) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Marc-Andrea broke Escobedo twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
Huesler has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (201-161). 1-1 on grass in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Huesler has a compiled3-5 record in the last 7 years on grass.
The Swiss’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Mexico City Challenger and the Aguascalientes Challenger.
Marc-Andrea has an aggregate 18-12 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Daniel Cox
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-20 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 16-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-6 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 554, the Brit got to the 2nd round after defeating Antoine Hoang 5-7 6-4 7-610, Mats Rosenkranz 7-5 6-3 and Federico Gaio 2-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Gaio, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Cox scored 92 points vs Gaio’s 91. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Cox recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Cox lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Cox put 66% of his first serves in, winning 65% (46/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (16/36) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Gaio 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The Brit’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Bath and M15 Torello.
Cox has a composed 16-8 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Huesler | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 83 |
| Pts | 70-54 | 268-250 |
| Total Points | 124 | 518 |
| Winners | 30 | 132 |
| %Winners | 43% | 49% |
Huesler played 1 match while Cox competed in 3 matches. Cox started his run from the qualifications while Huesler had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Cox conceded 2 sets while Marc-Andrea Huesler hasn’t conceded a set so far. Huesler has played 6 set(s) less than Cox (2 vs 8). Therefore, Huesler played 63 games less than Cox. Huesler scored 30 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel fired 132 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Huesler | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 34/56 | 178/272 |
| %1st in | 61% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 30/34 | 132/178 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 43/94 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 46% |
Huesler managed to score 11 aces . Cox managed to score 23 aces (7.7 per match). Huesler won 88% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Cox won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Huesler | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 9 |
| Converted | 2/11 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 18% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 21 |
| Saved | 1 | 15 |
| % Saved | 100% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Huesler broke his opponent twice with a 18% conversion rate. The Swiss quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Brit broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. Cox conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Huesler | |||
| R1 Escobedo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 70-54 | 70-54 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/56 | 34/56 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/34 | 30/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 2/11 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 18% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cox | |||||
| Q1 Hoang |
Q3 Rosenkranz |
R1 Gaio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 7-610 | 7-5 6-3 | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 21 | 27 | 83 | |
| pts | 116-108 | 60-51 | 92-91 | 268-250 | |
| Total points | 224 | 111 | 183 | 518 | |
| Winners | 56 | 30 | 46 | 132 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 50% | 50% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 13 | 3 | 7 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 72/109 | 35/56 | 71/107 | 178/272 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 63% | 66% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 56/72 | 30/35 | 46/71 | 132/178 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 86% | 65% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/37 | 12/21 | 16/36 | 43/94 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 57% | 44% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 75% | 75% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 12 | 21 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 4/4 | 9/12 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 100% | 75% | 215% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLLWL
Tennis Scores in Nottingham Challenger
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Alastair GrayGray (7-63 7-66) – See score progression
- Jack SockSock – Henri SquireSquire (6-2 7-67) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – John MillmanMillman (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-77 7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Jason JungJung (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Paul JubbJubb (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Arthur Fery/Felix GillFery/Felix Gill – Theo Arribage/Enzo CouacaudArribage/Enzo Couacaud (3-6 6-1 13-11) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Antoine BellierBellier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel CoxCox – Federico GaioGaio (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Marius CopilCopil (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Lukas LackoLacko (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (4-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Lucas PouillePouille (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Alastair GrayGray (7-6(3) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Marius CopilCopil (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CoxCox – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jordan ThompsonThompson (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Jack SockSock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
