Jason Jung and Giles Hussey will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.25
Giles Hussey -> 3.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Giles Hussey
There is no head to head record between Jason Jung and Giles Hussey since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 249, Jason got to the qualifications after beating Henry Patten 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Patten (7-5 6-4). During the match, Jung scored 74 points vs Patten’s 62. Jung was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jung managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jason Jung conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 74% of his first serves in, winning 83% (40/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Patten twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Jung has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (313-251). 2-1 on grass in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jung has a composed 16-22 match record in the last years on grass.
The Chinese has an aggregate 9-14 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Giles Hussey
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-15 | 29-9 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 674 (career-high), Hussey reached the qualifications after beating Billy Harris 7-64 7-61.
In the qualifications, Giles had a good straight sets win against Harris (7-64 7-61). During the match Hussey scored 88 points vs Harris’s 78. Hussey was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Hussey bagged 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Giles Hussey lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Hussey put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (42/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. Giles broke Harris twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Hussey’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Akko.
Hussey has an aggregate 10-8 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 26 |
| Pts | 74-62 | 88-78 |
| Total Points | 136 | 166 |
| Winners | 40 | 42 |
| %Winners | 54% | 48% |
Both Jung and Hussey played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jung and Hussey have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jung played 4 games less than Hussey. Jason scored 40 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit blasted 42 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 48/65 | 60/91 |
| %1st in | 74% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 40/48 | 42/60 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 55% |
Jung fired 5 aces . Hussey scored 3 aces . Jung won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Hussey won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/3 |
| % Converted | 33% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Jason broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Jason was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Hussey broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Patten |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 74-62 | 74-62 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/65 | 48/65 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 40/48 | 40/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Hussey | |||
| Q1 Harris |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 88-78 | 88-78 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 60/91 | 60/91 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 42/60 | 42/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LWLWLLLWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Alastair GrayGray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CoxCox – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian CashCash – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-1) – H2H and prediction
