Gabriel Decamps and Kenny de Schepper will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Lyon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on Court 23. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kenny de Schepper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kenny de Schepper is the pick to win this match.
Kenny de Schepper -> 1.69
Gabriel Decamps -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gabriel Decamps vs. Kenny de Schepper
There is no head to head record between Gabriel Decamps and Kenny de Schepper since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Gabriel Decamps
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-12 | 14-5 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2023 | 20-19 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-31 | 23-15 | 8-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 46-12 | 24-6 | 20-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, the Brazilian reached the qualifications after defeating Shintaro Mochizuki 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Gabriel had a good straight sets win against Mochizuki (6-3 7-5). During the match, Decamps scored 80 points vs Mochizuki’s 65. Gabriel was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Decamps scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Gabriel Decamps lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Decamps put 48% of his first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. Gabriel broke Mochizuki 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Decamps has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (103-52). 4-7 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Decamps has an overall59-33 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Brazilian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Vilnius and M25 Vale do Lobo.
Gabriel has an overall 16-14 win-loss record in 2022, 4-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lyon Challenger
The Brazilian has never competed in this tournament before.
Kenny de Schepper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-25 | 7-5 | 4-8 | 13-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371, De Schepper reached the qualifications after defeating Emilio Nava 3-6 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications against Nava, The French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 7-5). During the match de Schepper scored 90 points vs Nava’s 86. Kenny was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, de Schepper recorded 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Kenny de Schepper lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, de Schepper put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (47/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. De Schepper broke Nava 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Kenny’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Balma.
The French player has a composed 23-14 win-loss record in 2022, 12-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Decamps | de Schepper |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 21 | 28 |
Pts | 80-65 | 90-86 |
Total Points | 145 | 176 |
Winners | 25 | 47 |
%Winners | 31% | 52% |
Both Decamps and de Schepper played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kenny de Schepper dropped 1 set while Gabriel Decamps hasn’t lost a set so far. Decamps has played 1 set(s) less than de Schepper (2 vs 3). Therefore, Decamps played 7 games less than de Schepper. The Brazilian scored 25 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, De Schepper recorded 47 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Decamps | de Schepper |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 4 |
Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
1st in | 30/63 | 67/96 |
%1st in | 48% | 70% |
1st pts | 25/30 | 47/67 |
%1st pts | 83% | 70% |
2nd pts | 16/33 | 17/29 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 59% |
Decamps recorded 1 ace . de Schepper also struck 4 aces . Decamps won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, de Schepper won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Decamps | de Schepper |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/9 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 44% | 50% |
Conceded | 5 | 5 |
Saved | 4 | 4 |
% Saved | 80% | 80% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Decamps broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Decamps dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Decamps | |||
Q1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 80-65 | 80-65 | |
Total points | 145 | 145 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 30/63 | 30/63 | |
% 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 16/33 | 16/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
de Schepper | |||
Q1 Nava |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 90-86 | 90-86 | |
Total points | 176 | 176 | |
Winners | 47 | 47 | |
%Winners | 52% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 67/96 | 67/96 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 47/67 | 47/67 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo DonatiDonati – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Pablo AndujarAndujar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Gonzalo LamaLama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction